Teams

LTC:Jordan/Terrinca

2021 WMA Tri-Level (Fall 2021) · 3.0 Women 1

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-23vs LTC:Slice Girls:Roux/HadockLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Nancy Roux / Debbie Santos4-6, 6-5, 0-1
2021-11-02vs ETC:CoffeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Diane Boglisch / Jean Peretti3-6, 3-5
2021-10-28vs ETC:CoffeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Patricia Coffey / Erin Jarosz1-6, 1-6
2021-10-26vs ETC:Burns/FosterLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Kimberly Burns / Amy Corsetti6-4, 1-3, 0-1
2021-10-12vs ETC:Burns/FosterLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Kimberly Burns / Stephanie Foster3-6, 3-6
2021-09-19vs LTC:Slice Girls:Roux/HadockWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca vs Debbie Santos / Nancy Roux4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Linda Terrinca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Eileen Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Terrinca + Eileen Jordan295147% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Terrinca
56W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Eileen Jordan
60W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.