Teams

RUTHless Racquets 6.0x

2025 Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over · Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-04vs Tennis Fun 6.0xLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuan Luis Garcia / Maria Angelica Camp vs Tim Munshell / Jennifer Lora Gleason1-6, 6-7
2025-05-31vs Tennis Fun 6.0xWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Singh / Randi Goldrich vs Richard McKeon / Elizabeth McLeod6-4, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Tennis Fun 6.0xWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Singh / Eveline Shum vs Majed Hamawy / Kyung Haw Sung7-6, 6-3
2025-05-10vs Tennis Fun 6.0xLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlison Smith / Peter Tice vs Margaret Cornelius / Richard McKeon1-6, 0-6
2025-05-06vs Tennis Fun 6.0xWon 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Tice / Behnaz Yalda vs Raymond Barry / Emily Barry6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-23vs Tennis Fun 6.0xLost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Levit / Randi Goldrich vs Kyung Haw Sung / Ben Lazarus1-6, 1-6
2025-04-13vs Tennis Fun 6.0xLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Angelica Camp / Juan Luis Garcia vs Margaret Cornelius / Ben Lazarus1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Tice / Wonok Kim vs Mitchell Shapiro / Kyung Haw Sung6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEveline Shum / David Kochanski vs Richard McKeon / Jennifer Lora Gleason0-6, 1-6
2025-04-07vs Tennis Fun 6.0xLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Angelica Camp / Jason Levit vs Jing Huang / Tim Munshell3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.20
3.13
Tom Erdely
published
3.13
Greg Singh
published
2.97
Wonok Kim
published
2.97
Maria Angelica Camp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Bill Keating
published 3
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
published
2.85
Alison Smith
published 3
2.66
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Randi Goldrich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Eveline Shum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jason Levit
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Tom Erdely
26W–55L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Greg Singh
14W–26L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Wonok Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Maria Angelica Camp
144W–113L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Alison Smith
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Alexandra Magdaleno
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Randi Goldrich
10W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Eveline Shum
46W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Jason Levit
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.