Teams

Sportime Harbor Island

2021 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-01-24vs Vista: TRI-Hard With A VengeanceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNathan Anderson / David Goode vs Jeremy Goldberg / Phillip Rehg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Drexler / Jack Petrie vs Brett Howard / Craig Spenner5-7, 1-6
2020-12-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Anderson / David Goode vs Brian Dichoza / Michael Okamoto6-2, 6-3
2020-11-15vs Rye Racquet: Smash BrosWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Goode / Nathan Anderson vs Isagani Soriano Aves / Ricardo McKenzie7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPai Hwong / Jack Petrie vs Kevin Robinson / Philip Pettinato6-2, 6-2
2020-11-08vs WTC - Lifetime Road DogsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJon Lincoln / Chris Marks vs GEORGE RHO / Glen Sansone1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-11-01vs Armonk Tennis: Our NemesisWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathan Anderson / David Goode vs Andy Cheung / Evan Halperin7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPai Hwong / Jack Petrie vs Devon Faulkner / Chris Keenan6-2, 7-5
2020-10-25vs Vista: TRI-Hard With A VengeanceLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Bass / Thomas Drexler vs Michael Boehme / Thomas Youn0-6, 0-6
2020-10-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesDarnell Caballes / David Goode vs Brian Dichoza / Brian Guce6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Antenucci / Pai Hwong vs Jared Devera / CarloJay Maghirang6-2, 7-5
2020-10-11vs Rye Racquet: Smash BrosLost 03
L#1 DoublesJosh Kleinman / Sendhil Ramamurthy vs Isagani Soriano Aves / Ogbonna Chilaka4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Bass / Jack Petrie vs Atiba Rodriguez / Russvelt Vyas4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Fumo / David Lerer vs David Lee / Jia Zhu1-6, 4-6
2020-10-04vs WTC - Lifetime Road DogsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJon Lincoln / Chris Marks vs Bruno Cilio / Frederick Kincheloe7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Carlos Campo
published 5
4.47
Nathan Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Goode
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Darnell Caballes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.65
David Antenucci
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Pai Hwong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Thomas Rinaldi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Chris Marks
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Jack Cowles
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Fumo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Jon Lincoln
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
David Lerer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dean Maki
published
Jack Petrie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Bird
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Leigh Bass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sendhil Ramamurthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Vaughan
published
Thomas Drexler
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Goode + Nathan Anderson6159% games+4.2% vs expected
Chris Marks + Jon Lincoln302252% games−1.1% vs expected
David Antenucci + Thomas Drexler4448% games−2.0% vs expected
Pai Hwong + Thomas Drexler3651% games−4.1% vs expected
Jack Cowles + Dean Maki91245% games−6.2% vs expected
John Bird + Jack Cowles224 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Bass + Pai Hwong033 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Bass + Jack Petrie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Campo
34W–30L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.77
Nathan Anderson
68W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
David Goode
39W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Darnell Caballes
75W–67L career · 1 line in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
David Antenucci
119W–102L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Pai Hwong
83W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Thomas Rinaldi
115W–106L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Chris Marks
77W–65L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jack Cowles
48W–62L career · 8 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Paul Fumo
23W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jon Lincoln
69W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
David Lerer
22W–29L career · 1 line in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.66
Dean Maki
17W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jack Petrie
54W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Bird
22W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leigh Bass
4W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sendhil Ramamurthy
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Susan Vaughan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Drexler
35W–87L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.