Teams

Bupp

2024 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-07vs ROC: All Love No FightLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Repass / Manuel Castillo vs James Green / Spencer Ekola3-6, 1-6
2024-11-16vs Kelly/StohrLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Stephen Repass vs Darren Stohr / Zachary Shilvock1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesXunyi Xu / Chris Crockett vs Ryan Mott / Ryan Paddock6-7, 0-6
2024-11-09vs Cameron/PrunerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Stephen Repass vs Nathan Allen / Dominic Vito7-6, 7-5
2024-11-02vs Miller/HuberLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Ciccone / Nathaniel Foster vs Benjamin Klempka / Andrew Miller1-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs ROC: All Love No FightLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Repass / Manuel Castillo vs Justin Lansinger / Jeffrey Nowak4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesXunyi Xu / Anto Beslic vs Chris Fisher / Stephen Watson2-6, 1-6
2024-10-19vs Unit TurnLost 01
L#3 DoublesXunyi Xu / Anto Beslic vs Kurt Meichtry / Ankur Mody5-7, 4-6
2024-10-13vs Kelly/StohrLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Repass / Michael Bupp vs Tim Riskie / Zachary Shilvock0-6, 1-6
2024-10-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Ciccone / Nathaniel Foster vs Vimal Seshadri Raguraman / Vivek Chandra Hundi Nagaraju4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-29vs Miller/HuberSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Foster / Manuel Castillo vs Andrew Miller / Christopher Peets4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGraham Brown / Xunyi Xu vs Kevin Nowack / Richard Libby6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/Huber82201024242
2ROC: All Love No Fight8221926256
3Kelly/Stohr64191125265
4Cameron/Pruner55161429258
5Unit Turn2882247315
6Bupp1962452340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Nathaniel Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Stephen Repass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Michael Bupp
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.63
Manuel Castillo
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.31
Chris Crockett
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Anto Beslic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Graham Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gregg Hartvigsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jeffrey Ciccone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Xunyi Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Repass + Michael Bupp5253% games−0.6% vs expected
Gregg Hartvigsen + Michael Bupp3450% games−3.4% vs expected
Manuel Castillo + Michael Bupp4843% games−4.3% vs expected
Nathaniel Foster + Jeffrey Ciccone2544% gamesnot enough data
Gregg Hartvigsen + Nick Hunter0533% gamesnot enough data
Manuel Castillo + Stephen Repass1441% gamesnot enough data
Chris Crockett + Nick Hunter224 matchesnot enough data
Gregg Hartvigsen + Manuel Castillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nathaniel Foster
115W–51L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
Stephen Repass
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Michael Bupp
105W–88L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.78
Manuel Castillo
16W–25L career · 9 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Chris Crockett
30W–93L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3
Anto Beslic
19W–17L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Graham Brown
16W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gregg Hartvigsen
15W–38L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Ciccone
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Hunter
10W–27L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Xunyi Xu
29W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.