Teams

YTC-Golden Ball

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-25vs WRAC-NoydLost 03
L#1 DoublesGuislain Lagron / Rick Vaughan vs Greg Brizendine / Bryan Noyd4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShawn Tweedy / Chris Cantrell vs Richard Lester / Mark Taylor1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Craig Richardson vs Michael Bendtsen / Aaron Richmond6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-24vs HRSC-The Daft GeezersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrett Clark / David Whiteside vs William Gilchrist / Tim Arbogast6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGuislain Lagron / Rick Vaughan vs Robert Spajic / Michael Oates6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShawn Tweedy / Chris Cantrell vs Doug Orr / John Durkan6-4, 6-3
2025-10-24vs PFC-WillmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesRon Nehls / Mark Cherry vs Ray Willman / John Omlin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Mullins / Karl Lieberknecht vs Robert Vancott / Bill Popp6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Craig Richardson vs Clark Richards / Sean Lumsden3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Rick Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Danny Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Craig Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Brett Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Karl Lieberknecht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
David Whiteside
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Chris Cantrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Guislain Lagron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Cherry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Nehls
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Tweedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Vaughan + Mark Cherry314 matchesnot enough data
Rick Vaughan + Guislain Lagron224 matchesnot enough data
Danny Mullins + Karl Lieberknecht303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Vaughan
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Danny Mullins
33W–53L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Craig Richardson
1W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brett Clark
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Karl Lieberknecht
35W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
David Whiteside
15W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Chris Cantrell
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Guislain Lagron
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Fernandez
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Cherry
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ron Nehls
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Tweedy
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.