Teams

KY/PAD/LAMBERT

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER PADUCAH · 4.0 MIXED DOUBLES

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-05vs KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMissy O'Neill / Thomas Lambert vs Christina Rikel / Ben Howard6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeyton Morris / Amy Anderson vs Alexis Rouse / Isaiah Butler6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-02vs KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitson McNeill / Katie Hagan vs Jason Adcock / Susan Sullivan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Chustz / Amy Anderson vs Isaiah Butler / Alexis Rouse6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeyton Morris / Katie Hagan vs Ben Howard / Christina Rikel7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Coltharp / Kimberly Cates vs Alexis Rouse / Wes Long6-4, 6-2
2026-07-26vs KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARDWon 21
L#1 DoublesTaylor Boyd / Jason Coltharp vs Christina Rikel / Ben Howard6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Hagan / Thomas Lambert vs Holly Turner / Wes Long7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMissy O'Neill / Adam Chustz vs Alexis Rouse / Isaiah Butler6-1, 6-1
2026-07-22vs KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARDWon 30
W#1 DoublesWhitson McNeill / Missy O'Neill vs Wes Long / Susan Sullivan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Boyd / Thomas Lambert vs Isaiah Butler / Christina Rikel6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJason Coltharp / Kimberly Cates vs Ben Howard / Holly Turner6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 MIXED DOUBLES
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/PAD/LAMBERT41114996
2KY/PAD/ROUSE/HOWARD1441124154

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Whitson McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Kimberly Cates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Adam Chustz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Thomas Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jason Coltharp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Leyton Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Missy O'Neill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitson McNeill
16W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Kimberly Cates
11W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Adam Chustz
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Lambert
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jason Coltharp
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leyton Morris
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Missy O'Neill
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Boyd
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.