Teams

DEX-Tran 5.5 Combo Mix

2026 bSEM COMBO MIXED AUGUST · 5.5 COMBO MIXED MON

5 players · average NTRP 2.80 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-26vs LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBOLost 02
L#1 DoublesCe Zheng / Colleen Tracy vs Aaron Ward / Janet Barden1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBen Rapp / Sandra Timoszyk vs John Elliott / Lindsey Shedd3-6, 3-6
2026-08-19vs CHIP-Bausewein 5.5 MIX COMBOWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoy Farmer / Sandra Timoszyk vs Lynae Darbes / Paul Huang6-4, 6-2
2026-08-17vs LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBOWon 10
W#3 DoublesTram Tran / Ce Zheng vs Elizabeth Pettie / Seth Pettie6-2, 7-5
2026-08-12vs HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIXSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAaron Vermeulen / Kristina Rossi vs Danyelle Reynolds / MATTHEW TOMASZEWSKI4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCe Zheng / Sandra Vermeulen vs Meredith Miller / Kim Madeleine7-6, 6-3
2026-08-10vs CHIP-Bausewein 5.5 MIX COMBOWon 10
W#1 DoublesCe Zheng / Tracey Woolliscroft vs David Reed / Brittany Pendergraft6-4, 6-2
2026-08-05vs LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBOSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCe Zheng / Colleen Tracy vs John Elliott / Kaleigh Cornelison2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBen Rapp / Sandra Timoszyk vs Christopher Parker / Naomi Goldberg6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-03vs HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIXWon 10
W#3 DoublesTram Tran / Ce Zheng vs MATTHEW TOMASZEWSKI / Meredith Miller6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 5.5 COMBO MIXED MON
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HAWK-Chervenak 5.5 COMBO MIX601448106
2CHIP-Bausewein 5.5 MIX COMBO4111410110
3LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO4212613109
4EAST-MOORE 5.5 COMBO MIX3072773
5HAWK-Bosch 5.5 COMBO MIX3210515132
6DEX-Tran 5.5 Combo Mix237817147
7WESS-Studier 5.5 Mix Combo2471124169
8BOH-Acciaioli 5.5 COMBO MIX12451288
9DEER-Cousins 5.5 COMBO MIX134819136
10HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIX1531531205
11WESS-Roche-Kelly 5.5 COMBO MIX0521326158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kristina Rossi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Ce Zheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Janet Lawton
published 3
2.34
Sandra Timoszyk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Daisy Monroe
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kristina Rossi
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Ce Zheng
13W–11L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Janet Lawton
10W–20L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Sandra Timoszyk
58W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Daisy Monroe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.