Teams

CV-Palm Desert TC/Cannon

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesSusan Sacks / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Lori Tanking / Andrea Howland - Cobb6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Burn / Suzy Skone vs Jennifer Charron / Julie Vila6-1, 7-6
2023-12-03vs CV-Palm Springs TC/Caruso & S HopeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Gillen Keogh vs Susan Caruso / Merri Wells0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBlair Stone / Susan Sacks vs Kathy Rogers / Lorene Peirce3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Denise Roethenmund vs Patricia Baughman / Carolyn Wright6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-11-26vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Patricia Taylor vs Paula Buononato / Page Weissmann3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Sacks / Patricia Taylor vs Wanda Ramos / Kathy Rogers6-2, 6-0
2023-11-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRoxanna Nolan / Blair Stone vs Andrea Howland - Cobb / Heidi Kelly6-7, 2-6
2023-10-29vs LLW-CV-Mission Hills CC/A TennysonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Mary Kern vs Barbara Holmsten / Catherine Lind5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Taylor / Susan Sacks vs Michele Weddle / Sanae Chance2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Roethenmund / Suzy Skone vs Shelley Lynch / Marta Mykytyn-Hill3-6, 0-6
2023-10-22vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Cannon / Mary Kern vs Jane Engles / Kristal Wilson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Sacks / Patricia Taylor vs Lisa Hayes / Carrie Boutros7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKim Cline / Blair Stone vs Heather Black / Hilary Quinn3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Patricia Taylor
published
3.49
Sue Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Susan D Morin
published
3.40
Susan Sacks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Blair Stone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.22
Kate Burn
published
3.19
Ingrid Sarapuu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Roxanna Nolan
published
3.10
Barb Stoliker
published 3.5
3.06
Suzy Skone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Gillen Keogh
published 3.5
2.89
Karen Bernthal
published
Mary Kern
published
Sarah Angus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Sacks + Ingrid Sarapuu6258% games−2.5% vs expected
Susan Sacks + Blair Stone303 matchesnot enough data
Kate Burn + Ingrid Sarapuu123 matchesnot enough data
Suzy Skone + Ingrid Sarapuu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Taylor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.49
Sue Cannon
99W–81L career · 10 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Susan D Morin
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Susan Sacks
116W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Blair Stone
115W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Kate Burn
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ingrid Sarapuu
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Roxanna Nolan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barb Stoliker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Suzy Skone
36W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Gillen Keogh
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Karen Bernthal
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.89
Mary Kern
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Angus
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.