Teams

STC ALLEN

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Heather Evetts
published
3.40
Kayla Saing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Keirstin Vaccaro
published
3.38
Tricia Hamell
published
3.30
Bree Mcalister
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Brandi Skains
published 3.5
3.16
Bryanna Roop
published 3.5
3.10
Pam Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Carter Purcell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Sara Clarke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Bozena Krypel
published 3.5
2.98
Tracy Agren
published
2.97
Lori Domeracki
published
2.96
Elizabeth Tuazon Perez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.94
Tabitha Kane
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.91
Elena Batsalkin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.77
Sharon Harris
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Petra Heagy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristina Hodges
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Batsalkin + Elizabeth Tuazon Perez5355% games+8.6% vs expected
Tricia Hamell + Keirstin Vaccaro5259% games+4.1% vs expected
Pam Allen + Carter Purcell12853% games+1.8% vs expected
Lori Domeracki + Tracy Agren1631% games−17.7% vs expected
Bryanna Roop + Elena Batsalkin044 matchesnot enough data
Petra Heagy + Sharon Harris033 matchesnot enough data
Elena Batsalkin + Bree Mcalister303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Evetts
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Kayla Saing
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Keirstin Vaccaro
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tricia Hamell
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Bree Mcalister
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brandi Skains
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Bryanna Roop
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Pam Allen
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carter Purcell
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Sara Clarke
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Bozena Krypel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Tracy Agren
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Lori Domeracki
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Elizabeth Tuazon Perez
8W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Tabitha Kane
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Elena Batsalkin
10W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
Sharon Harris
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Petra Heagy
12W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kristina Hodges
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.