Teams

Je.Wooten-Quade18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-31vs Je.Albritton18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesShayne Brodsgaard vs Chase Felmet6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Anna Applegate6-2, 6-0
2023-07-24vs Da.Rusnak18S2.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesShayne Brodsgaard vs Sarah Kingery2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Kimberly Roth6-2, 6-1
2023-07-03vs La.Yopp18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesTaryn Backus vs Monika Garrell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-19vs Je.Komes18S2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesShayne Brodsgaard vs Gigi Martin1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesVeda Bynum vs Rachel Sanders1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Kristen Duke7-5, 6-3
2023-06-12vs Ma.Burton18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesShayne Brodsgaard vs Savannah Davidsson6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesVeda Bynum vs Claire Capps6-2, 6-3
2023-06-05vs As.Grantham18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTaryn Backus vs Ashley Grantham6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-22vs As.Noble18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesShayne Brodsgaard vs Casey Novak6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJenna Wooten-Quade vs Sandy An6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTaryn Backus vs ROBIN STEWART6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Shayne Brodsgaard
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
3.09
Taryn Backus
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jenna Wooten-Quade
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Ginger Scanlon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.36
Veda Bynum
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Scanlon + Jenna Wooten-Quade10358% gamesnot enough data
Shayne Brodsgaard + Jenna Wooten-Quade6071% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shayne Brodsgaard
130W–60L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Taryn Backus
68W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Jenna Wooten-Quade
41W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Ginger Scanlon
65W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
2.5
Veda Bynum
44W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.