Teams

Carlson

2022 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 (upper)

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 (upper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Deb Nguyen
published 5
4.32
Marian Bednar
published
4.31
Hannah Park
published 4.5
3.77
Nycole Vu
published
3.65
Roz Erlewein
published
3.24
Casey Carlson
published 3.5
3.23
Alysen Northern
published 3.5
Marcy Dale
published
Rachel Stokes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Deb Nguyen
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
4.47
Marian Bednar
25W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Hannah Park
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Nycole Vu
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Roz Erlewein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Casey Carlson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Alysen Northern
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Marcy Dale
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Stokes
14W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.