Teams

RBGCC Spring

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Alexander Sears6-3, 5-5
2023-05-15vs Team ChallengersWon 20
W#2 DoublesMario Levine / Emil Valle vs Eddie Gao / Jorge Grandy6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Christopher Craig6-4, 6-2
2023-05-08vs Team CourtmastersWon 20
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Jamie Buehler4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMario Levine / Emil Valle vs David Chu / David Parks6-4, 6-2
2023-04-24vs Unstrung HeroesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMario Levine / Mel Wesley vs Robert Smith / Joe Sibio1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJack Barufka / Emil Valle vs Craig Pickering / Eric Hopkins5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-17vs Racqueteers 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesMel Wesley / Emil Valle vs Keith Wojciech / Nobuyasu Sugimoto6-2, 6-3
2023-04-10Split 11
W#2 SinglesMel Wesley vs Emad Maghsoudi6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPeter Clyne / Emil Valle vs Zaq Lacy / Paul Ferrer6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-03vs Team RJT M3.0 OneLost 01
L#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Brent Gurney / John Glass0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sohale Razmjou
published
3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.78
Emil Valle
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
2.65
James Colucci
published 3
Jie Shi
published
John DeMoors
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emil Valle + Mel Wesley9459% gamesnot enough data
Mel Wesley + Mario Levine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sohale Razmjou
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Emil Valle
52W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
26W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
3
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jie Shi
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.