Teams

BBrupbacher (WSRC)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-01vs WTiedeman (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Major / Martin Iles vs Jon Nee / Gilbert Browne6-4, 6-4
2025-09-24vs RBredder (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGordon Lowman / Richard Teat vs Rod Spence / Bryan Skelton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-17vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRandall Miller / Martin Iles vs Tim Chu / Dick Parkhurst6-3, 6-2
2025-09-10vs SSwanson (Palisades)Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Major / Martin Iles vs Joe Beaton / Charles Bowers6-1, 6-3
2025-09-03vs MDriscoll/BHofmann (Lifetime)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGordon Lowman / Martin Iles vs Scott Carlton / Bob Hofmann5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Teat / Christian Guhl vs Chris Trunck / Gary Johnson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-20vs RBredder (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Cox / Martin Iles vs Scott Starling / David Hoeske7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-13vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Hinson / Richard Teat vs Jorge Triana / William Merlo6-7, 6-7
2025-08-12vs SSwanson (Palisades)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Major / Martin Iles vs Joe Beaton / Donald Klaproth5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Mike Farley
published
3.94
Gordon Lowman
published
3.89
Jeremy Caslin
published
3.87
Randall Miller
published
3.81
Richard Teat
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.80
Kevin Miller
published
3.73
Robert Major
published
3.66
Martin Iles
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.63
Bill Brupbacher
published 4
3.61
Larry McCorkle
published
Richard Hinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Teat + Martin Iles3355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Farley
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
Gordon Lowman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Jeremy Caslin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Randall Miller
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Richard Teat
91W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Kevin Miller
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Robert Major
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Martin Iles
161W–102L career · 13 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Bill Brupbacher
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Larry McCorkle
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Richard Hinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.