Teams

MEA PURPLE

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-27vs NJ GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roppel / Brendan Ash vs Kathleen Gerbino / Heather Young2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJen Chierotti vs Laura Garrido2-6, 3-6
2021-09-02vs NJ GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ash / Claudia Roppel vs Shannon Hempelman / Tracey Perry6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLonna Borden / Susan Dalgleish vs Sharon Gordon / Aline Pitney7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-08-26vs RCC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roppel / Lonna Borden vs Christina Kirkpatrick / Jennifer Gorrell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Dalgleish / Brendan Ash vs Maggie White / Ann Marie White0-6, 1-6
2021-08-23vs CVTA PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesLonna Borden / Susan Wu vs Suzanne DeVenny / Marica Follett6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrendan Ash vs Amie Elcan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Dalgleish / Claudia Roppel vs Xiaorui Li / Amalia Hurtado1-6, 0-6
2021-08-12vs BRMST YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ash / Claudia Roppel vs Debbie Miller / Cynthia Stadd Orvis2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Dalgleish / Susan Wu vs Mariah Pomara / Marlene Evans3-6, 3-6
2021-08-05vs NJ GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ash / Susan Wu vs Kristin Walters / Tracy Pickett4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Roppel vs Heather Young3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLonna Borden / Susan Dalgleish vs Nancy Ferrier / Kathleen Gerbino3-6, 2-6
2021-08-02vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJen Chierotti / Brendan Ash vs Amy Kempster / Shannon Hempelman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Roppel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.58
Brendan Ash
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.11
Susan Dalgleish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jen Chierotti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lonna Borden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Roppel + Brendan Ash5550% games+3.6% vs expected
Brendan Ash + Jen Chierotti033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claudia Roppel
17W–17L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Brendan Ash
33W–54L career · type A · 7 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
2.58
Susan Dalgleish
20W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jen Chierotti
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lonna Borden
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.