Teams

Bartz/Gustafson 4.0 40+ S23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-22vs Donovan- Deuces 40+ S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Bartz / Amy Gleason vs Ann Boline / Margret Stankovsky3-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs Harman/DeLaRiva- HarRiva 40+ S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Bartz / Amy Gleason vs Hillary Olson / Virginia de la Riva6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sharon Yson
published
3.86
Christy Douglas
published 4
3.67
Janet Loomis
published
3.63
Jill DeSanto
published
3.59
3.56
Yuko Goodwin
published
3.44
Amy Gleason
published 3.5
3.43
Stacey Douville
published
3.41
Kim Bartz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.34
Jeanne Ewen
published
3.33
Leah Galaudet
published
3.33
Jane Casto
published
3.31
Joan Gustafson
published
3.21
Shannon Overdahl
published
3.08
Molly Dymit
published
3.05
Kathy Cima
published
2.93
Jennifer Lewis
published
Kathy Buckman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Dymit + Shannon Overdahl3649% games+6.3% vs expected
Janet Loomis + Stacey Douville7850% games+0.1% vs expected
Shannon Overdahl + Kathy Cima3942% games−4.2% vs expected
Molly Dymit + Kathy Cima81438% games−7.2% vs expected
Kathy Cima + Joan Gustafson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Yson
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Christy Douglas
35W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Janet Loomis
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
Jill DeSanto
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Sonia Miller-Vanoort
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Yuko Goodwin
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Amy Gleason
28W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.44
Stacey Douville
32W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kim Bartz
117W–122L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jeanne Ewen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Leah Galaudet
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Jane Casto
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Joan Gustafson
43W–68L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Shannon Overdahl
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Molly Dymit
16W–44L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kathy Cima
17W–44L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jennifer Lewis
28W–38L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Kathy Buckman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.