← Teams

N OR-MPRC-Lee

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Yan Morrissey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Haihua Su
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 39% · published 3.5
2.77
Lee Gates
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Janice Hazel
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Laura Davies
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #1 Singles 15% · published 3
2.43
Xiaobo Dai
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
Results15 ties
2023-08-25Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDebora Cox / Janice Hazel vs Katie van Zyl / Amy Galanes6-3, 6-1
2023-08-25Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJanice Hazel / Andi Hendrickson vs Jaime Brucker / Liliana Cardenas6-3, 6-4
2023-08-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJanice Hazel / Sheila Amarga-Lee vs Min Jin Lee / Michelle Filomeo6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesXiaobo Dai / ANN ROMANO vs Molly Neal / Erika Mullins6-2, 4-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Hazel / Debora Cox vs Bri Plath / Rose Longoria6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJanice Hazel / Debora Cox vs Sharon Wise / Amy Olson0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-08Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Tsai / Janice Hazel vs Rebecca Kremer / Gail Abegg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-25Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLee Gates / Yan Morrissey vs Jaime Hamilton / Dorothy Shin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesXiaobo Dai / Janice Hazel vs Alexis Dyment / Karissa Ditgen6-0, 6-1
2023-03-24Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJanice Hazel / ANN ROMANO vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesXiaobo Dai / Haihua Su vs Margaret Jacobsen / Julie Poetsch6-0, 6-4
2023-03-19Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDebora Cox / Xiaobo Dai vs Amy Olson / Crystal Ounaphom6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHaihua Su / Yan Morrissey vs Elena Kochetkova / Roxanna Johnson7-5, 6-0
2023-03-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLee Gates / Laura Davies vs Samantha Damiano / Heather Sirr6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHaihua Su vs Joann Szueber6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebora Cox / Xiaobo Dai vs Claire Garrow / Marcia Obermiller6-3, 7-5
2023-03-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDebora Cox / Laura Davies vs Heather Dale / Sarah Cariaga6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesYan Morrissey vs CHRISTINE McNair7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXiaobo Dai / Lee Gates vs Heather Davidson / Kari Court6-1, 6-0
2023-02-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Davies / Lee Gates vs Amy Adams / Jenny Bailey6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHaihua Su vs Charlie Hilton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXiaobo Dai / ANN ROMANO vs Harshi Waters / Jessica Decker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Davies / Lee Gates vs Irina Stolerman / Stephanie Pelton6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesXiaobo Dai / Haihua Su vs Noelle Hamilton / Joanna Han7-6, 7-6
2023-02-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLaura Davies / ANN ROMANO vs Sarah Sasek / Kate Sullivan6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesYan Morrissey vs Cory Sebastian6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Hazel / Xiaobo Dai vs Susan Grabe / Kirsten Sessions7-6, 6-4
2023-01-08Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesLaura Davies vs Heather Edwards7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLee Gates / Janice Hazel vs Molly Slater / Erin Dineen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Yan Morrissey
54W–73L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3.5
Haihua Su
88W–65L career
5%95%0%
3.14
3
Lee Gates
83W–68L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Janice Hazel
46W–60L career
2%98%0%
2.71
3
Laura Davies
38W–39L career
17%83%0%
2.60
2.5
Xiaobo Dai
37W–38L career
0%55%45%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.