Teams

Blazing Aces

Fire & Ice 2024 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-08vs Dominion GrinchesLost 12
W#1 DoublesANGELA Bush / Roxana Aguilar vs Raquel Hubbert / Sarah Santos7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHana Svejdova / Natalie Soza vs Nancy Taft / Satchie Seidlits1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Espericueta / Tisha Belcher vs Molly Miller / Laurie Garbett2-6, 2-6
2024-12-06vs Holiday Hit SquadWon 21
W#1 DoublesTisha Belcher / Kari Bivins vs Diana Garcia / Lathia Bell6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoxana Aguilar / Hana Svejdova vs Lauren Salazar / Heather Wilkinson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Espericueta / Aurora Robles vs Patoa Belgam / Jennifer Adams5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Roxana Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Selena Ryza
published
3.07
Kari Bivins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
ANGELA Bush
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Tisha Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Natalie Soza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Hana Svejdova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Chimene Burnett
published 3
2.73
Leslie Espericueta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Aurora Robles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Selena Ryza + Roxana Aguilar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roxana Aguilar
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Selena Ryza
22W–32L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Kari Bivins
41W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
ANGELA Bush
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Tisha Belcher
29W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Natalie Soza
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Hana Svejdova
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Chimene Burnett
24W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Leslie Espericueta
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.