Teams

SS-H YELLOW

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-06vs EM GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Chris Thulin vs Jean Steimel / Jll McLain2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKim MacKendrick / Carol Lugo vs Jennifer Grumann / Katy Kappler6-3, 6-0
2024-07-30vs CHCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Holly Payne vs Dananne Solomon / Holly Strandes4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Parks / Carol Lugo vs Kim Addlesperger / Jordan Feiner6-0, 7-6
2024-07-23vs HRCA-S GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Chris Thulin vs Elizabeth Freestone / Jennifer Jackson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Vickie Conroy vs Sherri Partlow / Toni Chalmers4-6, 4-6
2024-07-16vs GCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Carol Lugo vs Merry Logan / Andrea Carrington3-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs CACM PINKWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Carol Lugo vs Stephanie Martins / Elizabeth Walker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-02vs GAC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCheryl Sanders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Payne / Carol Lugo vs Lauren Hanzlik / Ann Baer2-6, 5-7
2024-06-25vs PTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarol Lugo / Chris Thulin vs Tracy Pursell / Cindy Wells6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Holly Payne vs Caren Swan / Elizabeth Restivo6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Chris Thulin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Carol Lugo
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.30
Kim MacKendrick
published
3.18
Vickie Conroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Holly Payne
published
3.12
Cheryl Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Heidi David
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Lugo + Cheryl Sanders14557% games+2.6% vs expected
Chris Thulin + Cheryl Sanders111251% games+0.9% vs expected
Chris Thulin + Carol Lugo8749% games−1.1% vs expected
Kim MacKendrick + Cheryl Sanders5251% games−4.4% vs expected
Holly Payne + Cheryl Sanders0637% games−5.7% vs expected
Carol Lugo + Vickie Conroy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Thulin
103W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carol Lugo
127W–91L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kim MacKendrick
30W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Vickie Conroy
83W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Holly Payne
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cheryl Sanders
133W–123L career · 7 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Heidi David
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.