Teams

Cr.Smith18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-09vs Je.Mitchell18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmy Robinson / Mandi Chappell vs Vickie Dagit / Garnett Webb6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesStephanie Simpson / Emy Hanson vs Lisa Lathram / Priscilla Nanney6-3, 6-4
2023-10-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Kouba / Emy Hanson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-18vs Lu.Lav18CLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacy Thiedeman / Emy Hanson vs Susie EL-Kaissi / Katie Percy0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Smith / Mandi Chappell vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Emma Coblentz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-11vs Ra.Matthews18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesMandi Chappell / Crystal Smith vs Rachel Matthews / Brittany Moye2-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs Jo.Zorzi18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Simpson / Emy Hanson vs Molly Clark / Veronica Glass6-2, 6-4
2023-08-14vs Ki.Johnson18C6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCrystal Smith / Mandi Chappell vs Diane Sauer / Caroline Fungaroli2-6, 4-6
2023-08-11vs Le.Veit18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmy Hanson / Stephanie Simpson vs Melissa Ferrell / Caroline Wall6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Melissa Graham
published
3.24
Anna Kouba
published 3.5
3.18
Crystal Smith
published 3.5
3.09
Stacy Thiedeman
published
3.07
Ramsay Younger
published
3.04
Stephanie Simpson
published
2.96
Emy Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Mandi Chappell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramsay Younger + Emy Hanson4352% games+5.8% vs expected
Stephanie Simpson + Charlotte Kopp123 matchesnot enough data
Mandi Chappell + Emy Hanson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Graham
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anna Kouba
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Crystal Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Stacy Thiedeman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Ramsay Younger
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Stephanie Simpson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Emy Hanson
65W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Mandi Chappell
65W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67
Mary Elizabeth Phillips
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.