Teams

*6-LSchaller-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-26vs *8-JScaglione-EPHSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusanne Schmal / Kellyn Kropinak vs Johannah Maynor / Jamie Scaglione1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Goodwin / Shannon Bartle vs Michelle Koeneke / Britni Buckner2-6, 0-6
2024-04-19vs *7-SLussier-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKellyn Kropinak / Annaliese Gresham vs Nav Grewal / Colleen Starns6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Howell-Davis / Hala Souid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-12vs *9-CGonzales-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Jennifer Dunlap1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCristina Raiti / Lori Davis vs Kristen Anderson / Xian Zhang6-0, 6-1
2024-04-09vs *1-NWatts-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Goodwin / Shannon Bartle vs Amy Peters / Gail Gardner6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAnnaliese Gresham vs Jane Stewart6-3, 6-2
2024-04-07vs *4-KHolt-HSWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Schaller / Pamela Howell-Davis vs Kathy Holt / Kimberly Roberts6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCristina Raiti vs Carin von Kahr6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-22vs *5-SStowe-SVCWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Bartle / Matalaba Napier vs Katherine Zeph / Christina Chenet5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValerie Williams / Kellyn Kropinak vs Linda Sundler Bjorkman / Elizabeth Psaltis6-4, 6-2
2024-03-18vs *2-APerry-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Maria Behan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Raiti / Annaliese Gresham vs Anne Lucas / Junga Han6-0, 6-0
2024-03-14vs *3-ACombs-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatalaba Napier / Susanne Schmal vs Lauren Long / Megan Lott7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Liz Morris1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnnaliese Gresham / Madeline BRADY vs Carolyn Krisko / Stacy Price7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Liz Schaller
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Madeline BRADY
published
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.58
Cristina Raiti
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Kellyn Kropinak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Annaliese Gresham
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.06
Hala Souid
published
Ericka Briceno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.6% vs expected
Pamela Howell-Davis + Shannon Bartle3742% gamesnot enough data
Annaliese Gresham + Cristina Raiti5260% gamesnot enough data
Liz Schaller + Pamela Howell-Davis2339% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Kellyn Kropinak2350% gamesnot enough data
Annaliese Gresham + Pamela Howell-Davis314 matchesnot enough data
Matalaba Napier + Shannon Bartle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Madeline BRADY
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Cristina Raiti
36W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
119W–146L career · 8 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%43%57%
2.53
3
Kellyn Kropinak
28W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 3 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Annaliese Gresham
68W–81L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
Hala Souid
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Ericka Briceno
0W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.