Teams

El.Zimmerman55A

2026 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-23vs Be.Robertson55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs Beth Stagner / Robin Wascher7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLouella Venable / DOROTHY BROWN vs Catherine Chavez / Lisa Austin3-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs Sh.Chapman55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDOROTHY BROWN / Stephanie Gillespie vs Lee Berrios-Smothers / Amy Ellis1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLouella Venable / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Shirley Chapman / Caroline Miller3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Zargo / Ellen Zimmerman vs Amber Bruner / Perry LeGaux3-6, 3-6
2026-04-08vs Hop.Pflaum55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs LaDonna Lee / Dorothy Nance4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Winstead / Rebecca Glendy vs Hope Pflaum / Stacy Grose7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDOROTHY BROWN / Kelly Zargo vs Wendie Hill / Linda Nuxoll4-6, 1-6
2026-04-02vs Ki.Lamb55A3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Gillespie / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Corinne Alavi / Jo Ann Novak3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDOROTHY BROWN / Sarah Winstead vs Dana Eaves / Christy van Ness4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Anderson / Louella Venable vs Mary Lewis James / Bethany Stempien6-7, 1-6
2026-03-26vs An.Redmond55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Rebecca Glendy vs Suzanne Ruggles / Anne Redmond6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Winstead / Stephanie Gillespie vs Stephanie Lee / Dawn Johnstone2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Zargo / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Susan Starnes / Dora Reed6-7, 1-6
2026-03-19vs Mo.Garrell55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs Jan Copeland / Britt Tolliver5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Gillespie / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Catherine Bray / Denise Gold3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Zargo / Ellen Zimmerman vs Laura Edgerton / Leanne Stradling3-6, 5-7
2026-03-05vs Be.Robertson55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Gillespie / Sarah Winstead vs Diana Kennedy / Catherine Chavez1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Anderson / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Susan Wilkerson / Beth Stagner0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDOROTHY BROWN / Louella Venable vs Robin Wascher / Michele Zaytoun3-6, 1-6
2026-02-25vs Sh.Chapman55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs Debra Vaughn / Perry LeGaux6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDOROTHY BROWN / Mary-Lynn Reuter vs Amy Ellis / Lee Berrios-Smothers1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1We.Sielaty55A3.09020719193
2Sh.Chapman55A8018614158
3Ca.Werder55A3.063171020194
4Vi.Dagit55A63151229252
5Da.Rusnak55A63141329242
6An.Redmond55A5315920186
7Ki.Lamb55A3.053121230236
8Be.Rubin55A54151229229
9Hop.Pflaum55A4415921194
10Te.Jones55A45161126244
11Ca.Zimmerman55A45151227223
12Su.Bowers55A45141332247
13Be.Robertson55A35111329214
14Mo.Garrell55A35111330234
15Ki.Roberts55A1852247302
16El.Zimmerman55A0822244288
17Ma.Springfield55A0942349303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Garnett Webb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Stephanie Gillespie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Kelly Zargo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Erika Plant
published 3
2.46
Sarah Winstead
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Mary-Lynn Reuter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.40
Rebecca Glendy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Louella Venable
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.10
DOROTHY BROWN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Paula Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Hochstrasser + Garnett Webb2445% games−4.3% vs expected
Sarah Winstead + Stephanie Gillespie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Garnett Webb
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Stephanie Gillespie
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Kelly Zargo
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Erika Plant
44W–55L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Sarah Winstead
41W–99L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Mary-Lynn Reuter
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Rebecca Glendy
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Louella Venable
43W–112L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
DOROTHY BROWN
3W–14L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Paula Anderson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.