Teams

LCTA40/Zielinski/CTC

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-18vs LCTA40/Kronsberg/MaybankLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Kannenberg / Joann Purdy vs Rhett Ambrite / Brannon Montgomery2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Eischeid / Michelle Zielinski vs Allyson Priddy / Amy Henderson6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Kapeluck / Mary Zubrinsky vs Katy Shahid / Tammy Trenholm6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-11vs LCTA40/KeithRonk/CreeksideWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Anne Kapeluck vs Liz Bernstein / Lauren Ronk2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoann Purdy / Kristin Korotney vs Sarah Sass / Katherine Pauli6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiana Shirley / Catherine Kannenberg vs Ashlee Henney / Kate Besta4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-28vs LCTA40/Gibbons/DotyWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Matheson / Adrienne Eischeid vs Tammy Karika / Elizabeth Holt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Shirley / Kristin Korotney vs Stephanie Jacky / Melanie Ivonowski6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Zielinski / Anne Kapeluck vs Jill Ross / Amy Long0-6, 5-7
2025-07-28vs LCTA40/McGarty/DICLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Anne Kapeluck vs Jennifer Noone / Cheryl Baumann3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Zielinski / Kristin Korotney vs Christa Struk / Jennifer Yarbrough3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Shirley / Catherine Kannenberg vs Judy Kirkpatrick / Cara Schaafsma7-6, 6-2
2025-07-14vs LCTA40/Bowers/MaybankLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Shirley / Susan Piedfort vs Celia Shore / Tara White3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Eischeid / Beth Matheson vs Jenny Alderman / Liz Speidel6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Zubrinsky / Karen Belanger vs Michelle Crivella / Janneke Vreede-Schaay7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2024-03-07vs LCTA40/South/I'onWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Piedfort / Adrienne Eischeid vs Christy Jervey / Allie Wurzel6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDiana Shirley / Michelle Zielinski vs Katy Yahr / Viktoria Payne6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Diana Shirley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Kristin Korotney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Beth Matheson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Joann Purdy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Mary Zubrinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Susan Piedfort
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Michelle Zielinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Adrienne Eischeid
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Apple
published 3.5
3.20
Catherine Kannenberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Anne Kapeluck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Karen Belanger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Piedfort + Kristin Korotney7073% games+4.9% vs expected
Diana Shirley + Beth Matheson6356% games+1.7% vs expected
Diana Shirley + Susan Piedfort7256% games−0.0% vs expected
Diana Shirley + Michelle Zielinski4454% games−3.8% vs expected
Diana Shirley + Catherine Kannenberg5151% games−4.4% vs expected
Denise Apple + Michelle Zielinski0526% gamesnot enough data
Diana Shirley + Joann Purdy134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Shirley + Margaret Hamilton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Shirley
84W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Kristin Korotney
84W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Beth Matheson
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Joann Purdy
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mary Zubrinsky
57W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Susan Piedfort
61W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Michelle Zielinski
17W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Adrienne Eischeid
51W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Denise Apple
37W–37L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Kannenberg
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Anne Kapeluck
31W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Karen Belanger
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Hamilton
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.