Teams

LA - Last Changeover

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-02vs LA - MCC Court KingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTatsuya Ogawa / Jose Verdida vs David Hubka / Ariel Sotolongo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDarv Nichole Dayondon / Rodney Ferrell vs Raul Hernandez / Michael Rapkin0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPhilip Luu / Loc Nguyen vs Robert Rudelius / Gerald Tarlow4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-13vs LA - Misfits and MishitsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRodney Ferrell / Will Stewart vs Shawn Robertson / Anthony A Vo4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesClement Chan / Juan Pereira vs David Kane / Mitchell Pruitt4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJose Verdida / Joseph Mihal vs Eric Geiger / Jon San6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Adam Sapper
published 4
3.82
Tatsuya Ogawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Kenneth Huang
published
3.79
Joseph Mihal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Chris Bedford
published 4
3.77
Juan Pereira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Frank Reback
published
3.69
Philip Luu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Clement Chan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Rodney Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Douglas Shin
published
3.55
Dustin Louie
published
3.50
Darv Nichole Dayondon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Jose Verdida
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ray Cherry
published
Will Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Sapper
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Tatsuya Ogawa
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kenneth Huang
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Joseph Mihal
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Chris Bedford
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Juan Pereira
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Frank Reback
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Philip Luu
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Clement Chan
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Rodney Ferrell
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Douglas Shin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Dustin Louie
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Darv Nichole Dayondon
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jose Verdida
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Ray Cherry
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Stewart
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.