Teams

McVeigh

2024 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-29vs Baldwin-3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNicole Gownley vs Lisa Mulholland2-6, 0-6
2024-10-21vs Lady Strikers SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKellie Gough McLendon vs Colleen Quinlan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-16vs Lady Strikers SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesKellie Gough McLendon vs Courtney Laughlin5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Aklil Getachew1-6, 2-6
2024-10-09Split 11
W#2 SinglesKellie Gough McLendon vs Bayley Hochradel6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Adrienne Kowcz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-06Won 10
W#2 SinglesErin McVeigh vs Jennifer Baldwin6-2, 6-2
2024-10-02vs Lady Strikers SinglesLost 01
L#3 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Roshni Fifadra4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-29vs Single the FunWon 10
W#2 SinglesKellie Gough McLendon vs Karen Francis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-09vs Single the FunWon 10
W#2 SinglesKellie Gough McLendon vs Tina Rohm6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kellie Gough McLendon
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin McVeigh
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Brenae Fadden
published 3.5
3.23
Heather Dodd
published
3.18
Heather Nesti
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
3.04
Nicole Gownley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Mason
published
2.94
Bridget Kelly
published 3
2.82
Julie Webster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Nesti + Erin McVeigh6363% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kellie Gough McLendon
42W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Erin McVeigh
101W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Brenae Fadden
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Heather Dodd
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Heather Nesti
179W–165L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Nicole Gownley
57W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Mason
1W–16L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Bridget Kelly
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Julie Webster
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.