Teams

HHTL55/Hunt/South Beach

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · Men 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-13vs HHTL55/Dumas/Moss CreekLost 12
L#1 DoublesDOUGLAS CALAHAN / Keith Herreman vs Walt Nelson / Bennett Stewart1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Moore / Steve Helgeson vs Charles Vasilakis / Thomas Herschel6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Lewis / Dante Mancini vs Brian Gough / Roger Lange6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDOUGLAS CALAHAN / Keith Herreman vs Mark McDermott / Dennis Moody1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Moore / Steve Helgeson vs Christopher Bisgard / Patrick Cummings1-6, 2-6
2026-03-30vs HHTL55/Williams/Indigo RunLost 02
L#1 DoublesDOUGLAS CALAHAN / Keith Herreman vs Tim Marlette / David Shatz4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Lauranzano / Scott Lewis vs Ron Williams / Paul Lerch4-6, 2-6
2026-03-23vs HHTL55/Dumas/Moss CreekLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hunt / Larry Lauranzano vs Robert Maharrey / David Bell1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesThomas Moore / Steve Helgeson vs Walt Nelson / Bennett Stewart3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDante Mancini / Scott Lewis vs Kevin Kowal / Ken Gleitsmann3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-20vs HHTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Larkin)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hunt / DOUGLAS CALAHAN vs Chuck Jones / William Davison2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Herreman / Dante Mancini vs Todd Zinke / Steve Griggs6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAl Moosbrugger / Richard Feldman vs John Guran / Roger Benning5-7, 6-7
2026-03-17vs HHTL55/Williams/Indigo RunLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hunt / DOUGLAS CALAHAN vs Tim Marlette / Chris Candy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Herreman / Michael Williamson vs Michael Hardy / Jeffrey Vanino4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Helgeson / Scott Lewis vs Ron Williams / Edward Majewski4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-09vs HHTL55/Brondell/WexfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hunt / DOUGLAS CALAHAN vs Karl Brondell / Mark Brown6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKeith Herreman / Michael Williamson vs Ed Bilthouse / Mike Levine2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Moore / Steve Helgeson vs William Busch / David Obrien6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKeith Herreman / Michael Williamson vs Christopher Bisgard / Joe Reimer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Moore / Steve Helgeson vs Mark Sander / Mark Clawson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDante Mancini / Larry Lauranzano vs Raymond Mitro / Miles Tedder3-6, 2-6
2026-02-09vs HHTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Larkin)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Lewis / Larry Lauranzano vs Alan Fu / William Davison0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Helgeson / Thomas Moore vs Hank Cram / Steve Griggs6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Feldman / Dante Mancini vs Roger Benning / Nick Donato2-6, 3-6
2026-02-05vs HHTL55/Brondell/WexfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeith Herreman / Michael Williamson vs Karl Brondell / Doug Watson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteve Helgeson / Thomas Moore vs Allen Oechsner / Rick Stetzer6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Feldman / Larry Lauranzano vs William Busch / Martin Hahn1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Leventhal)9121921216
2HHTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Larkin)82191125264
3HHTL55/Williams/Indigo Run55171330259
4HHTL55/Brondell/Wexford37141634276
5HHTL55/Dumas/Moss Creek3782246311
6HHTL55/Hunt/South Beach28111942304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Matthew Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
DOUGLAS CALAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Steve Helgeson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Al Moosbrugger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Keith Herreman
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.62
Dante Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Larry Lauranzano
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.54
Richard Feldman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Williamson
published
Scott Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DOUGLAS CALAHAN + Keith Herreman033 matchesnot enough data
DOUGLAS CALAHAN + Matthew Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hunt
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
DOUGLAS CALAHAN
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Steve Helgeson
7W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Al Moosbrugger
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Keith Herreman
4W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Dante Mancini
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
Larry Lauranzano
6W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Richard Feldman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Michael Williamson
17W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.