Teams

Western: Off R ROCkers

2023 65&Over Women · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Elaine Heekin vs Claudia Borman / Alison Rutter6-1, 6-0
2023-08-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Elaine Heekin vs Claudia Borman / Sally Pearson6-1, 6-2
2023-07-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesElaine Heekin / Neerja Bhatnagar vs Claudia Borman / Alison Rutter6-0, 6-1
2023-07-06vs Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Couture / Christine Steele vs Melody Fredrickson / Nancy Radoff2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Diana Kurty vs Shirley Yablonski / Joanne Engelhardt6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Keegan / Linda Partelow vs Marla Share / Susan Berger5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-29vs Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Eisenman / Joanne Parkes vs Shirley Yablonski / Melody Fredrickson7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLinda Partelow / Caroline Burton vs Laura Kahn / Elizabeth Hill1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Diana Kurty vs Joanne Engelhardt / Marla Share6-4, 6-2
2023-06-22vs Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarol Eisenman / Joanne Parkes vs Elizabeth Hill / Laura Kahn6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesArlene Monte / Dawn Deperrior vs Gwenn Judge / Melody Fredrickson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlinda Drury / Karen Keegan vs Joanne Engelhardt / Marla Share5-7, 6-7
2023-06-15vs Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesArlene Monte / Sandra Couture vs Elizabeth Hill / Laura Kahn1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Eisenman / Joanne Parkes vs Shirley Yablonski / Gwenn Judge7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlinda Drury / Karen Keegan vs Nancy Radoff / Joanne Engelhardt6-3, 6-3
2023-06-08vs Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesArlene Monte / Sandra Couture vs Nancy Radoff / Laura Kahn6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Deperrior / Joanne Parkes vs Gwenn Judge / Shirley Yablonski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Burton / Linda Partelow vs Elizabeth Hill / Joanne Engelhardt6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Off R ROCkers4110514130
2Anderson / Yablonski 65+ 7.01451022157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Joanne Parkes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Neerja Bhatnagar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Arlene Monte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alinda Drury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diana Kurty
published 3.5
3.24
Caroline Burton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Carol Eisenman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Dawn Deperrior
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christine Steele
published
Karen Keegan
published
Linda Partelow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Couture
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Burton + Joanne Parkes3253% games+5.5% vs expected
Neerja Bhatnagar + Caroline Burton6355% games−1.5% vs expected
Sandra Couture + Arlene Monte10357% gamesnot enough data
Linda Partelow + Caroline Burton4454% gamesnot enough data
Neerja Bhatnagar + Joanne Parkes0622% gamesnot enough data
Arlene Monte + Caroline Burton5158% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Couture + Joanne Parkes3250% gamesnot enough data
Neerja Bhatnagar + Carol Eisenman2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanne Parkes
34W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Neerja Bhatnagar
112W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Arlene Monte
36W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alinda Drury
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diana Kurty
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Burton
85W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carol Eisenman
114W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dawn Deperrior
23W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Christine Steele
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Keegan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Partelow
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Couture
32W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.