Teams

Dertien/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 20 2:00 PM
St Georges Independent School
2026-09-01vs Deupree/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebbie Walker-Hulette / Mary Ellen Mathews vs Wang-Ying Glasgow / Brooke Levy6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandy Maness / Marla Goodwin vs Laura Stafford / Carley Myrick7-6, 6-3
2026-08-26vs Lewis/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Patterson / Deborah Kershner vs Neely Leavell / Suzanne Sexton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Ellen Mathews / Kimberly Laschober vs Ragan Washburn / Courtney Smith6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandy Maness / Lesley Grubbs vs Josie Hammons / Samantha Douglas5-7, 5-7
2026-08-09vs Moore/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJenny Mortimer / Vivian Gresham vs Sarah Farris / Meredith Flynn2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarla Goodwin / Debbie Walker-Hulette vs Sarah Hervey / Katie Moore2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lang/ Memphis1021217
2Tayloe/Memphis1021221
3Dertien/Memphis1021431
4Echols/ Memphis02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Marta Schmitt
published
4.26
Mary Ellen Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.25
Jenny Mortimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Sandy Maness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Stephanie Longsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Lesley Grubbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Debbie Walker-Hulette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Marla Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Kimberly Laschober
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Deborah Kershner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Vivian Gresham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Sharon Dertien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ellen Mathews + Jenny Mortimer314 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Grubbs + Sandy Maness123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marta Schmitt
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Mary Ellen Mathews
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Jenny Mortimer
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Sandy Maness
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Stephanie Longsworth
21W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Lesley Grubbs
51W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Walker-Hulette
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Marla Goodwin
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Kimberly Laschober
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Deborah Kershner
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Vivian Gresham
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Sharon Dertien
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.