Teams

ICC 40+ 3.5 S23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Amy Richter
published 3.5
3.23
Erin Schmidtke
published
3.23
Heather Bennett
published
3.21
Jody Aafedt
published
3.17
Stacy Best
published
3.16
Leslye Emptage
published
3.12
Jane Pirtle
published
3.05
3.04
Jaime Norling
published
2.75
Kristin Smith
published
2.57
Tricia Peterson
published
Gretchen Faust
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Pirtle + Leslye Emptage10949% games−0.8% vs expected
Jody Aafedt + Stacy Best033 matchesnot enough data
Jody Aafedt + Heather Bennett213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Pirtle + Gretchen Faust213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Schmidtke + Gretchen Faust123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Richter
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.78
Erin Schmidtke
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Heather Bennett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jody Aafedt
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Stacy Best
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
Leslye Emptage
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Jane Pirtle
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Samantha Hauser-Johnson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jaime Norling
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kristin Smith
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Tricia Peterson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Gretchen Faust
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.