Teams

JNance40+Mixed

2022 Cap Mixed 40 & over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs JWOLBORSKY MIXED 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Lee / Bobby Hammond vs Trey Morris / Michelle Staub0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames Reardon / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Jill Dykes / Geoffrey Mueller4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-19vs LElliott 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Hammond / Stephanie Lee vs Lori Elliott / Isaac Johnson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGarrett Lovejoy / Suzanne Ruggles vs Mark Stevenson / Kelly Foglia6-2, 6-2
2022-07-14vs PAlford 40+Won 21
L#1 DoublesBobby Hammond / Jennifer Maier vs Wendy Christensen / Kyle Truman5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Reardon / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Tyler Priest / Shelley Truman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKurt Holmberg / Suzanne Ruggles vs Chrissy Hartsfield / Drew Hartsfield6-4, 6-1
2022-06-30Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Maier / Bobby Hammond vs Lauren King / Kevin Hampton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Nance / Lisa Fultz vs John Nani / Kristen Levine6-7, 2-6
2022-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Lee / Bobby Hammond vs Jay Blanchfield / Lisa Freeman7-5, 6-2
2022-06-22vs BKaulback 40+ 6.0 MixedWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobby Hammond / Jennifer Maier vs Beth Farrell / Michael Gee6-0, 6-1
2022-06-10vs SKingWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Fultz / Evan Fultz vs Stephanie King / Charles King6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / James Reardon vs Courtney Kaprelian / Peter Kaprelian6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Kimberly McLellan
published
3.21
Evan Fultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Fultz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Bobby Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.90
Garrett Lovejoy
published 3
2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
2.63
Joel Nance
published
Kurt Holmberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Fultz + Evan Fultz12954% games−10.1% vs expected
Ana Maria Allessi + Bobby Hammond4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly McLellan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–110L career · 1 line in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Fultz
179W–126L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Bobby Hammond
91W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Garrett Lovejoy
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Joel Nance
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kurt Holmberg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.