Teams

UPTA70A/Spearman/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Adult 70 & Over - SC · 70+ Adult Women - 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-17vs UPTA70A/Walker/CardinalLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Cooper / Peggy Rutland vs Beth Timmons / Pamela Herron6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTherese Woorons / Jane Slane vs Bobbie Cancelliere / Henrietta Walker4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Covington / Phyllis Spearman vs Lucy Cathey / Shelby Pierson2-6, 3-6
2025-03-27vs UPTA70A/Walker/CardinalLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah B Bowyer / Peggy Rutland vs Beth Timmons / Pamela Herron4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Cooper / Therese Woorons vs Bobbie Cancelliere / Henrietta Walker1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Chapman / Jane Slane vs Lucy Cathey / Rosanne Pruitt3-6, 1-6
2025-03-06vs UPTA70A/Walker/CardinalLost 03
L#1 DoublesDianne Galloway / Therese Woorons vs Beth Timmons / Pamela Herron3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Chapman / Linda McFall vs Bobbie Cancelliere / Henrietta Walker2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Covington / Jane Slane vs Judy Elrod / Rosanne Pruitt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 70+ Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Deborah B Bowyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dianne Galloway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Slane
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda McFall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jo Covington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Orr
published
Peggy Rutland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phyllis Spearman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Therese Woorons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carol Cooper
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deborah B Bowyer
19W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Dianne Galloway
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jane Slane
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda McFall
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jo Covington
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Orr
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Rutland
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis Spearman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Therese Woorons
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.