Teams

Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/For

2025 Monroe Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Monroe (18&O) Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-21vs Patrick/18's/3.5W/MacWon 50
W#1 DoublesKimberly Leija / Natalie Leija vs Sherry Hamilton / Kathy Patrick6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLaura Blackwell vs Paula Hoer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWesley Johnson / Helen Johnson vs Milly McIntyre / Marsha Cobb6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnna Shaw vs Deborah Giger6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDani Manning / Misti Hajj vs Brenda Hilburn / Julie Johnson6-3, 6-4
2025-04-20vs Patrick/18's/3.5W/MacWon 50
W#1 DoublesKimberly Leija / Natalie Leija vs Kathy Patrick / Brenda Hilburn6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAnna Shaw vs Deborah Giger6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHelen Johnson / Wesley Johnson vs Milly McIntyre / Marsha Cobb6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHolly Coons vs Paula Hoer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary K Gilley / Dani Manning vs Dianne Graham / Sherry Hamilton7-5, 6-4
2025-04-16vs Patrick/18's/3.5W/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesDiana Breen / Misti Hajj vs Brenda Hilburn / Kathy Patrick6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHolly Coons vs Deborah Giger5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary K Gilley / Dani Manning vs Dianne Graham / Marsha Cobb6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnna Shaw vs Paula Hoer6-2, 6-2
2025-04-15vs Patrick/18's/3.5W/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Blackwell / Kylie Berry vs Julie Johnson / Sherry Hamilton6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHolly Coons vs Deborah Giger6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Breen / Misti Hajj vs Kathy Patrick / Brenda Hilburn6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAnna Shaw vs Paula Hoer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Monroe (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leija/18's/3.5AW/Mon/For402001124
2Patrick/18's/3.5W/Mac0402040241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Anna Shaw
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.47
Misti Hajj
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Mary K Gilley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Wesley Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dani Manning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Holly Coons
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Diana Breen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Kylie Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Leija
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Natalie Leija
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Shaw
9W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Misti Hajj
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Mary K Gilley
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
Wesley Johnson
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Dani Manning
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Holly Coons
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diana Breen
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kylie Berry
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kimberly Leija
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Blackwell
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Leija
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.