Teams

LDHeicken40+PAC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 7.5 Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-27vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / JUSTIN E SKWARA vs Bradley Bolick / Craig Hughes7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-13vs LGSimonetti WestportLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Jeff Lloyd vs Adam Labar / Scott Nestor1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Allen Foster vs Jim Cochran / Jonathan Aberle1-6, 1-6
2022-09-06vs LJDoyle40/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDerek Heicken / John Kindbom vs William Balatow / Bradford Powell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom McElhenny / Jeff Lloyd vs Robert Bachner / Craig Thomas6-3, 6-4
2022-08-30vs LRCA-Caballero-NMP 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Heicken / Jeff Lloyd vs Venkatesh Sampoornam / Antony Jayapal2-6, 4-6
2022-08-23vs LJBanner/PeninsulaLost 01
L#2 DoublesDerek Heicken / Eugene Olsen vs Bill Moore / Louis Foreman2-6, 2-6
2022-08-16vs LTNoyes/RR -7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesTom McElhenny / Clarence Gover vs Thomas Noyes / Robert Squatriglia4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tom McElhenny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Allan Keswick
published 4
3.29
John Kindbom
published
3.26
Jeff Lloyd
published
Charles Sorrell
published 3.5
3.07
Derek Heicken
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Clarence Gover
published 3.5
2.87
Eugene Olsen
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Heicken + Tom McElhenny1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tom McElhenny
70W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Allan Keswick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
John Kindbom
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Jeff Lloyd
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Charles Sorrell
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Derek Heicken
33W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Clarence Gover
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Eugene Olsen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.