Teams

55 & Over M7.0 - MonteHiedra Ruben Morales

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over M7.0-Flight 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.36 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesRuben Morales / Ivan Tirado vs Eric Dieppa / Jose Serrano2-6, 1-6
2022-02-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoberto Santiago / Manuel Enrique Roca vs Samuel Martin / Jeff Williams2-6, 5-7
2022-02-26vs 55 & Over M7.0 - CTH Jose CamposLost 01
L#2 DoublesRuben Morales / Ivan Cardona vs Jose Lopez Rosa / Javier Roman1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesManuel Enrique Roca / Jose Rivera-Colon vs Jaime Fornaris / Alberto Mulero0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over M7.0-Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Carlos Morales
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.47
Francisco Menendez
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.26
Henry Carrion
published 3.5
3.13
Manuel Enrique Roca
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Erasmo Lopez
published 3.5
3.11
3.05
Johnny Mejias
published
2.88
Ivan Cardona
published 3
Hector Cardona
published 3
Ivan Tirado
published 3
2.67
Jose Rivera-Colon
published
Roberto Cruz
published
Roberto Santiago
published
Ruben Morales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberto Cruz + Henry Carrion0533% gamesnot enough data
Erasmo Lopez + Carlos Morales303 matchesnot enough data
Ivan Cardona + Hector Cardona033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos Morales
46W–30L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
4
Francisco Menendez
51W–31L career · 8 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Henry Carrion
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Manuel Enrique Roca
28W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Erasmo Lopez
28W–27L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Norman David Storer Padro
27W–23L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Johnny Mejias
55W–69L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Ivan Cardona
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Hector Cardona
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ivan Tirado
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jose Rivera-Colon
12W–38L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
2.67
Roberto Cruz
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roberto Santiago
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruben Morales
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.