Teams

Le.Magee55C

2024 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-10vs An.Pfeiffer55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesFran Ange / Heidi Duggins vs Dana Weiland / Averil Glover3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Magee / Maureen Nixon vs Leigh Kimball / Julie Fleming4-6, 3-6
2024-09-30vs Ja.Terrell55CLost 02
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Maureen Nixon vs Ginger Shields / Elisebeth Gelardi5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Trefzger / Susanne Knowles vs Catherine Brawner / Suzanne Brown4-6, 3-6
2024-09-23vs Le.Corn55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesFran Ange / Maureen Nixon vs Joyce Lake / Laurie Randall7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeigh Magee / Sarah Schmalz vs Leslie Corn / Sherry Ingle6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Ann Willard vs Susan Hembarsky / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-09vs De.Collins55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Dana Chapman vs Judith Gallagher / Julie Sauls6-7, 3-6
2024-08-26vs Ta.LeFevre55C7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesDana Chapman / Sarah Schmalz vs Diane Werner / Deb Lanier2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Faltisco / Maureen Nixon vs Joan Faulkner / Andrea McCartney6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Duggins / Leigh Magee vs Cybele Brockmann / Martha Funsten7-5, 6-4
2024-08-19vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Heidi Duggins vs Laura Davidson / Julie Brigham6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Faltisco / Maureen Nixon vs Jane Hunter / Camille Conzola3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-12vs Ja.Terrell55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Magee / Sarah Schmalz vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Catherine Brawner4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Fran Ange vs Cassie Fuller / Kim McDonald6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Willard / Dana Chapman vs Helen Harris / Rebecca Procter6-7, 6-7
2024-08-05vs Le.Corn55CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHeidi Duggins / Suzanne Wagner vs Joyce Lake / Susan Hembarsky6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFran Ange / Sarah Schmalz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Cindy Faltisco
published 4
3.53
Ginger Sluder
published
3.53
Leigh Magee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Dana Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Fran Ange
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Suzanne Wagner
published
3.22
Susanne Knowles
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
published
3.09
Heidi Duggins
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Maureen Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Shelly Schiff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Nixon + Heidi Duggins10654% games−0.4% vs expected
Fran Ange + Heidi Duggins1944% gamesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Leigh Magee6355% gamesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Susanne Knowles4155% gamesnot enough data
Ann Willard + Heidi Duggins2346% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Duggins + Dana Chapman5058% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Magee + Heidi Duggins224 matchesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Heidi Duggins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Faltisco
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Ginger Sluder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Leigh Magee
45W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Dana Chapman
56W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–100L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Suzanne Wagner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Susanne Knowles
94W–122L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann Willard
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lynn Trefzger
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Heidi Duggins
95W–121L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Maureen Nixon
77W–85L career · 8 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Shelly Schiff
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.