Teams

LA - Triforces

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-05vs LA - Ace DragonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarren Earl / George Rodriguez vs Adam Winkler / Oleksandr Ostrovskyi5-7, 5-7
2021-11-22vs LA - Rancho RangersWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Rodriguez / Darren Earl vs Gerald Blankson / Charlton Gillette6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-11-13vs LA - Team SlayWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarren Earl / Martin Chi vs Eric Geiger / Michael Vasquez7-6, 7-6
2021-11-07vs LA - Griffin ClubWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Rodriguez / Darren Earl vs Jeffrey Kabot / Javad Kazemieh4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-06vs LA - MountainGateLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarren Earl / George Rodriguez vs Jamie Murphy / Randolph Magnin7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-24vs LA - Sets on FireWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rodriguez / Darren Earl vs Stephen Nimick / Matthew Gawrych6-1, 6-3
2021-09-26vs LA - MulhollandLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarren Earl / George Llewellyn vs Kamall Shaikh / Dwight Nakagawa4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-09-12vs LA - LATCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartin Chi / Darren Earl vs Brian Cheng / Ivan Fatovic2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Martin Chi
published
3.89
Darren Wong
published 4
3.83
Jonathan Talbot
published
3.82
George Llewellyn
published 4
3.81
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.69
Sergio Ibarra
published
3.60
Darren Earl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Ortiz-Reyes + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Chi
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Darren Wong
18W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
Jonathan Talbot
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
George Llewellyn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.81
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
22W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Sergio Ibarra
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Darren Earl
108W–148L career · 8 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.