Teams

Oaksmith 3.5 18+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesGena Conron / Stephanie Ruskin vs Susan Reichard / Arlene Kitahara3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-11vs Casual Sets 18+Split 11
L#1 DoublesRochelle Porter / Gena Conron vs Amy LaMoure / Elizabeth Goldy4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Targonski / Kim Neiss vs Tammy Turner / Kathleen Cullins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-25vs Spin-derellas 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesGena Conron / Stephanie Ruskin vs GENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Elisabeth Garcia-Wade vs Jennifer Shepard / Katie Tetrault6-2, 7-5
2022-05-21vs Courts In Session 18+Lost 01
L#2 SinglesGena Conron vs Kimberly Walko6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-17vs Sparks 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGena Conron / Jackie Crispell vs Donna Slaughter / Allison Sneller5-7, 0-6
2022-05-07vs Ladies Who Love 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesRochelle Porter / Stephanie Ruskin vs Brenda Poore / Kathy Greene6-2, 6-3
2022-04-23vs Players Are Ready 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hendon / Stephanie Ruskin vs Sung Cho / Elizabeth Bartlett4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGena Conron vs Caroline Vantiem6-0, 6-1
2022-04-15vs Sets in the City 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGena Conron / Rochelle Porter vs Kimberly Ford / Tracy Flaherty6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-12vs Ladies of the Net 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesAshling Pollard / Kim Neiss vs Amy Champion / Kimberly Sbarra6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lorinda Rawlings
published
3.28
Lynn Gorman
published
3.26
3.18
Margaret Asher
published
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Sherry Houff
published
3.12
Monica Targonski
published
3.11
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
3.10
Ashling Pollard
published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
published 3.5
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Loan Nguyen
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−4.2% vs expected
Sherry Houff + Monica Targonski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorinda Rawlings
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Margaret Asher
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 9 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sherry Houff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Monica Targonski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.