Teams

Lobsters

55 & Over Mixed Doubles · 8.0 AMD Mixed Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-29vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Parrish / Mary Ehmann vs John Thomas / Linda Trevenen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Flinner / Linda van Roosmalen vs Ed Townsend / Debra DeWitt7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Heide / Arla Baker vs Michael Kruppa / Carla Babe2-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Parrish / Kristen Campbell vs John Kejas / Carla Babe3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteve Hay / Gina DeCola vs Chip Chomyn / Dana Shahen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Schneider / Arla Baker vs Craig Mizer / Linda Trevenen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Heide / Julie Lichtenstein vs Michael Kruppa / Debra DeWitt6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFrank Haley / Kristen Campbell vs Rafael Sevilla Serrano / Linda Trevenen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Flinner / Linda van Roosmalen vs Ed Townsend / Camilla Hill1-6, 5-7
2026-02-27vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Heide / Julie Lichtenstein vs Craig Mizer / Linda Trevenen2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMary Ehmann / Alex Parrish vs Ed Townsend / Dana Shahen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Haught / Sophia Zhang vs Carla Babe / John Kejas2-6, 2-6
2026-02-15vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Heide / Julie Lichtenstein vs Craig Mizer / Carla Babe2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Haley / Arla Baker vs Bill Demark / Linda Trevenen2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Haught / Sophia Zhang vs Newell Washburn / Annette Wagner-Knott7-5, 6-3
2026-02-06vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Hay / Gina DeCola vs Camilla Hill / John Thomas5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArla Baker / Alex Parrish vs Linda Trevenen / Rafael Sevilla Serrano3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-01vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Haught / Sophia Zhang vs Craig Mizer / Carla Babe3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Haley / Kristen Campbell vs Rafael Sevilla Serrano / Linda Trevenen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Heide / Marion Hughes vs Chip Chomyn / Jennifer Cheng3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs Brady's Run 55+ 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFrank Haley / Marion Hughes vs Craig Mizer / Carla Babe2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJohn Heide / Julie Lichtenstein vs Bill Demark / Jennifer Cheng6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMatt Flinner / Arla Baker vs Newell Washburn / Annette Wagner-Knott3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 AMD Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Steve Hay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Linda van Roosmalen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
John Heide
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Julie Lichtenstein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Frank Haley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Marion Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Arla Baker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Alex Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Matt Flinner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Gina DeCola
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Sophia Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Mary Ehmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Campbell
published
Paul Schneider
published
Steven Haught
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Haley + Linda van Roosmalen6846% gamesnot enough data
John Heide + Julie Lichtenstein314 matchesnot enough data
Frank Haley + Kristen Campbell213 matchesnot enough data
Steve Hay + Linda van Roosmalen033 matchesnot enough data
Sophia Zhang + Steven Haught123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Hay
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Linda van Roosmalen
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
John Heide
28W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Julie Lichtenstein
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Frank Haley
117W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Marion Hughes
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Arla Baker
185W–125L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Alex Parrish
68W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Matt Flinner
79W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Gina DeCola
86W–87L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Sophia Zhang
62W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary Ehmann
35W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Kristen Campbell
59W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Schneider
55W–72L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Haught
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.