Teams

AWillard18+TRI

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-07-26vs DDriscollLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy DiGiuseppe / Teri O'Neill vs Donna Driscoll / Marilyn Slaymaker0-6, 3-6
2022-06-28vs RMann Tri Level 2022Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy DiGiuseppe / Teri O'Neill vs Julie Karg / Jill Salstrand3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Chrissy Hederick
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Sherrie Smith
published
3.20
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Cole
published
3.00
Jodi Zorzi
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.93
Kathleen Henig
published
2.75
Amy DiGiuseppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Teri O'Neill
published
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Pamela Pitre
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Laurie Randall
published
Regina Heroux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Zorzi + Pamela Pitre3640% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Jade Paunovich3444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chrissy Hederick
64W–69L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sherrie Smith
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ann Willard
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Sharon Cole
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jodi Zorzi
35W–72L career · 9 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Kathleen Henig
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amy DiGiuseppe
32W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Teri O'Neill
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 9 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Pamela Pitre
47W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Laurie Randall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Regina Heroux
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.