Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-28vs LT BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesAaron Carta vs William Freet6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRodney Campos / Stephen Moritz vs Luko Krnan / Joseph Rehfus6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-21vs MLF ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Diel / Scott Houldsworth vs James Dyer / Tim Walsh6-1, 6-1
2024-05-14vs FCCC REDWon 20
W#2 SinglesAaron Carta vs Joseph Basta3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRodney Campos / Henry Fang vs Grant Taylor / Paul Woodley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-07vs FCCC PURPLESplit 11
W#2 DoublesScott Houldsworth / Nicholas Diel vs James Dickinson / WILLIAM BIGGS4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAaron Carta / Henry Fang vs Frankie Cerrone / Greg Lammons3-6, 3-6
2024-04-30vs HMTC SILVERWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiego Melchert / Rodney Campos vs Joe Whitlock / Ian Charles6-2, 4-4
2024-04-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Nicholas Diel vs Derek Chun / Robert Sullivan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.78
Jonathan Koester
published
3.76
Jeff Arnett
published
3.47
Mitchell Jamison
published
3.44
Daniel Holmes
published 3.5
3.42
Nicholas Diel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Rodney Campos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Chris Provost
published 3.5
3.18
Scott Houldsworth
published
3.17
Aaron Carta
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Henry Fang
published
James DuPriest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Holmes + Jeff Arnett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Schlicting
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Jonathan Koester
23W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Jeff Arnett
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Mitchell Jamison
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Daniel Holmes
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Nicholas Diel
73W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Rodney Campos
56W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Chris Provost
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Scott Houldsworth
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.18
3.5
Aaron Carta
48W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Henry Fang
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James DuPriest
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.