Teams

Burger - No Strings Attached

2024 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Brill / Colleen Begg vs Sharon Stanton / Courtney Wajbel6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-08vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Begg / Leigh Williams vs Leigh Tobin / Tiffany Sherren4-6, 1-6
2024-05-31vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Jennifer Coles vs Lynn Chincheck / Catherine Gearhart3-6, 1-6
2024-05-28vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Leigh Williams vs Leigh Tobin / Catherine Gearhart4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Genevieve Gigliotti4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Christine Hammann vs Betsy Campochiaro / Hilary Roxe7-5, 7-6
2024-05-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Courtney Wajbel6-2, 6-2
2024-05-04vs Whitty - Bold StrokesLost 01
L#3 DoublesBernadette Burger / Patrice Holtz vs Lynn Chincheck / Leigh Tobin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Sarah London
published
2.81
Christine Hammann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Bernadette Burger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Colleen Begg
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.52
Gail Lawson
published
Patrice Holtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Begg + Christine Hammann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah London
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
2.96
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Bernadette Burger
56W–70L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Colleen Begg
35W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Patrice Holtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.