Teams

DBuchman (Russell)

2026 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-17vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Buchman / Nancy Dunn vs Lindsey Linker / Debbie Carmazzi2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Richards / Maebeth Hill vs Shirley Stoltenberg / Janet Baker7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Shackelford / Anita Dowker vs Lisa Riggins / Nicole Morris2-6, 3-6
2026-04-10vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnita Dowker / Ann Richards vs Carol Almond / Rosemary Hill1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Dunn / Maebeth Hill vs Nicole Morris / Shirley Stoltenberg4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Buchman / Rene Roulier vs Janet Baker / Debbie Carmazzi0-6, 2-6
2026-04-03vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Dunn / Leila Tissue vs Marty Corley / JoAnn Crolley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaebeth Hill / Susan Shackelford vs Janet Baker / Debbie Carmazzi1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Buchman / Rene Roulier vs Saundra Denny / Shirley Stoltenberg4-6, 0-6
2026-03-27vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLeila Tissue / Maebeth Hill vs Saundra Denny / Shirley Stoltenberg6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Lacarter / Nancy Dunn vs JoAnn Crolley / Marty Corley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Richards / Anita Dowker vs Nicole Morris / Lisa Riggins5-7, 3-6
2026-03-20vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Palanica / Susan Shackelford vs JoAnn Crolley / Marty Corley3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Dunn / Maebeth Hill vs Shirley Stoltenberg / Saundra Denny2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Buchman / Ann Lacarter vs Ruth Shaffner / Janet Baker1-6, 7-6
2026-03-13vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Lacarter / Rene Roulier vs Debbie Carmazzi / Rosemary Hill7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Buchman / Leila Tissue vs Shirley Stoltenberg / Janet Baker3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Richards / Maebeth Hill vs Lisa Riggins / Nicole Morris5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-06vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Buchman / Susan Shackelford vs Nicole Morris / Lisa Riggins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Dunn / Maebeth Hill vs Debbie Carmazzi / Saundra Denny7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Palanica / Anita Dowker vs Rosemary Hill / Shirley Stoltenberg0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DBuchman (Russell)2571433231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Leila Tissue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Rene Roulier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Ann Lacarter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Susan Shackelford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Ann Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Nancy Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Maebeth Hill
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.24
Anita Dowker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Kate Palanica
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Donna Buchman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karol Kreshon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maebeth Hill + Nancy Dunn0533% games−1.5% vs expected
Maebeth Hill + Leila Tissue2450% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dunn + Karol Kreshon224 matchesnot enough data
Anita Dowker + Susan Shackelford213 matchesnot enough data
Leila Tissue + Donna Buchman123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Buchman + Ann Lacarter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leila Tissue
110W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Rene Roulier
18W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Ann Lacarter
34W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Susan Shackelford
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ann Richards
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Nancy Dunn
11W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
Maebeth Hill
49W–56L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anita Dowker
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kate Palanica
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Donna Buchman
7W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Karol Kreshon
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.