Teams

Skyview

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-28vs FK Paris - BarletLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatja Morris / Tracy Shisler vs Beatrice Barlet / Bonnie Keating2-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs FK Paris - BarletLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Collinson / Tracy Shisler vs Mylan Barfield / Beatrice Barlet6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-08vs Glenview PerkinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesRita Meek / Carol Hirsch vs Robin Lancaster / Marcia Plante6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Shisler / Henny David vs Marilu Burden / Diane Cassidy1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTana Hubbard / Carmen Rosengarten vs Dina Sapienza / Patricia James1-6, 3-6
2026-03-01vs Marion/HaynesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynne Finman / Tracy Shisler vs Angie Insco / Pamela Plumlee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tana Hubbard vs Julie Haynes / Carol Mecca3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarmen Rosengarten / Carol Hirsch vs Donna Jarvis / Ellen Perrone0-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs Glenview Village Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Finman / Maureen Maloney vs Michelle Nathan / Julie Davidson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRita Meek / Carol Hirsch vs Elizabeth Bosco / Susie Day4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Beatrice Barlet vs Mary Meek / Mime Ichini-Lurie4-6, 0-6
2026-02-14vs Glenview PerkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Shisler / Beatrice Barlet vs Diane Cassidy / Catherine Sersen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Maureen Maloney vs Maria AnneDiOrio / Marilu Burden3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHenny David / Tana Hubbard vs Sally Perkins / Maricel Keiter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-08vs FK WalshWon 20
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Carol Hirsch vs Marianne Marcoux / Michelle Broder6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHenny David / Tana Hubbard vs Carmen Rosario / Natalie Petsche7-6, 6-4
2026-02-07vs FK Queens of the CourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracy Shisler / Beatrice Barlet vs Michelle Smith / Jovita Hentz6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Lynne Finman vs Margarita Posada / Anchalee Phataralaoha6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHenny David / Maureen Maloney vs Kim Arcobello / Georgina Bumpas6-3, 7-6
2026-01-25vs Marion/HaynesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracy Shisler / Lynne Finman vs Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce / Hera Peterson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTana Hubbard / Petrea Coleman vs Julie Haynes / Cheryl Prusak6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Rita Meek vs Kathy Hatfield / Deborah Borge-Shaffer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-17vs FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAMWon 21
L#1 DoublesHenny David / Tana Hubbard vs Rhonda Lane / Jennifer Halinski2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Shisler / Irma Buttermore vs Caroline Murray / Raksha Ramkissoon7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRita Meek / Carol Hirsch vs Maggie Berardi / Heidi Yates6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Beatrice Barlet
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Carol Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Carmen Rosengarten
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Henny David
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Irma Buttermore
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lynne Finman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maureen Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Petrea Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rita Meek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tana Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Shisler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henny David + Tana Hubbard134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Hirsch + Rita Meek303 matchesnot enough data
Irma Buttermore + Rita Meek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beatrice Barlet
100W–104L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Carol Hirsch
7W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Carmen Rosengarten
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Henny David
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynne Finman
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Maloney
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Petrea Coleman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rita Meek
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tana Hubbard
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Shisler
6W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.