Teams

HOCO-LAMOTHE

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-30vs RN-STONELost 02
L#1 DoublesChip Stork / Randy Moss vs Norm Pearson / Brad Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesManoj Shah / Terry Jones vs Matt Stone / Jeffrey Moody4-6, 2-6
2025-09-23vs RN-STONELost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Branch vs Richard Ricks5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelvin Oliver / CHRISTOPHER HUNTER vs Randy Griffin / Andrew Russell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott McClain / Manoj Shah vs Matt Stone / Christopher Wright4-6, 2-6
2025-09-18Split 11
L#1 SinglesERIC ADAMS vs Richard Ricks2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Branch / Chip Stork vs Christopher Davis / Christopher Wright6-4, 6-4
2025-09-09vs RN-STONELost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Thompson / David Branch vs Brad Smith / Jeffrey Moody6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott McClain / Randy Moss vs Matt Stone / Andrew Russell4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrooks Fox / Philip West vs Christopher Wright / Charlie Lanphier6-3, 6-4
2025-09-02vs RN-STONEWon 30
W#1 SinglesERIC ADAMS vs Andrew Russell7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelvin Oliver / CHRISTOPHER HUNTER vs Matt Stone / Christopher Wright6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrooks Fox / Terry Jones vs Ronald Burd / Charlie Lanphier6-0, 6-4
2025-08-26vs RN-STONEWon 21
W#1 SinglesERIC ADAMS vs Matt Stone6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTerry Jones / Manoj Shah vs Jeffrey Moody / Christopher Wright0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrooks Fox / Randy Moss vs Ronald Burd / Christopher Davis6-2, 6-1
2025-08-19vs RN-STONEWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott McClain / Chip Stork vs Randy Griffin / Charlie Lanphier6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Branch / Philip West vs Christopher Davis / Chuck Davis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOCO-LAMOTHE61171123194
2RN-STONE16111738281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
CHRISTOPHER HUNTER
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.35
David Branch
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Rudy Lamothe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Philip West
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Kelvin Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Chip Stork
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Randy Moss
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
ERIC ADAMS
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Scott McClain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Brooks Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Terry Jones
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Manoj Shah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rob Crain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelvin Oliver + CHRISTOPHER HUNTER4162% gamesnot enough data
Brooks Fox + Philip West314 matchesnot enough data
Scott McClain + Chip Stork314 matchesnot enough data
Manoj Shah + Brooks Fox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CHRISTOPHER HUNTER
53W–28L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
David Branch
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Rudy Lamothe
17W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Philip West
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Kelvin Oliver
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Chip Stork
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Randy Moss
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
ERIC ADAMS
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Scott McClain
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Brooks Fox
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Terry Jones
21W–24L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Manoj Shah
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Rob Crain
16W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.