Teams

Junior/LR/Reb

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-02-09vs Clark/LR/RebsWon 20
W#2 SinglesKelsy Knox vs Molly Murdock6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAnita Junior vs Christa Clark6-2, 6-2
2026-01-15vs DGarretson/MH/BPLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Lazenby vs Tess Bradford2-6, 2-6
2026-01-13vs Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Morgan Smith3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jara vs Sydney Ross3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKelsy Knox vs Elizabeth Blackshaw6-2, 6-0
2026-01-06vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelsy Knox vs Katie Rutledge6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Lazenby vs Autumn Hemphill6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Tiffanie Taylor7-5, 5-3
2025-12-19vs Brown/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 SinglesDiana Pearson Martin vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHope Rider vs Dorian Craft2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Jara vs Ellie Karvoski3-6, 2-6
2025-12-16vs Sullivan/Overley/LR/CCLRLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnita Junior vs Morgan Smith3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jara vs Hannah Rabinowitz2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDenise Allen-Duff vs Elizabeth Blackshaw4-6, 0-6
2025-11-23vs Brown/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesHope Rider vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jara vs Anna Morshedi1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKelsy Knox vs Erika Johnson6-2, 6-2
2025-11-18vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Lazenby vs Tiffanie Taylor6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesHope Rider vs Robin Reed7-6, 2-1
2025-07-31vs Brown/LR/RebLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Martin / Diana Pearson Martin vs Dorian Craft / Chris Halket7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnita Junior / Eric Baker vs Randy Rankin / Shiloah Kviatkovsky2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kelsy Knox
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.43
Diana Pearson Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Elizabeth Jara
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Hope Rider
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Anita Junior
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Katelyn Lazenby
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Denise Allen-Duff
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Lynn Stone
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsy Knox
39W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Diana Pearson Martin
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Elizabeth Jara
11W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Hope Rider
26W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Anita Junior
35W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Katelyn Lazenby
14W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Denise Allen-Duff
44W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Lynn Stone
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.