Teams

Western: Rally Gators

2021 40&Over Mixed · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-16vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Karr / David Gibbons vs Maureen Goldsmith / Mark Balsamo6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSeth O'Neil / Kathleen Savage vs Deborah New / Frank Jergler6-0, 6-0
2021-08-05vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Stoner / William Schoepfel vs Tien Kim / Tim Lyon6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesScott Fairchild / Kathleen Savage vs Dan Geba / Karen Soanes6-1, 6-2
2021-07-26vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Karr / Seth O'Neil vs Tien Kim / Frank Jergler6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Gibbons / Shelley Alfieri vs Deborah New / Mark Balsamo6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKerry Hallock / Josh Gingrich vs Maureen Goldsmith / Tim Lyon6-3, 6-1
2021-07-22vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Gibbons / Kerry Hallock vs Mark Balsamo / Maureen Goldsmith6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesScott Fairchild / Kathleen Savage vs Tim Lyon / Karen Soanes6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Karr / William Schoepfel vs Tien Kim / Frank Jergler6-1, 6-0
2021-07-16vs Empire Tennis AcademyWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaire Stoner / Josh Gingrich vs Dan Geba / Erika Rosenberg6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Karr / William Schoepfel vs Deborah New / Tim Lyon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShelley Alfieri / Scott Fairchild vs Maureen Goldsmith / Mark Balsamo6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Rally Gators50132459
2Empire Tennis Academy0521326157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lydia Varon
published 4
3.58
Josh Gingrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Scott Fairchild
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Kathleen Savage
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
David Gibbons
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Jennifer Karr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Claire Stoner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Shelley Alfieri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kerry Hallock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Schoepfel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Karr + David Gibbons6072% gamesnot enough data
Claire Stoner + Josh Gingrich314 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Alfieri + William Schoepfel404 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Alfieri + Scott Fairchild314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Karr + William Schoepfel404 matchesnot enough data
David Gibbons + Kerry Hallock404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lydia Varon
85W–86L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
Josh Gingrich
98W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Scott Fairchild
73W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Kathleen Savage
101W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
David Gibbons
112W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jennifer Karr
65W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Claire Stoner
58W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Shelley Alfieri
137W–98L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kerry Hallock
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
William Schoepfel
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.