Teams

Garnett/Memphis

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.60 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-23vs Johnson/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Green / Eva Farris vs Shanna Eason / Olivia House3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer London / Heather Sappenfield vs Katherine House / Sharon Shipley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Davis / Gabriela Herbst vs Colleen Wilson / Kate Sullivan2-6, 3-6
2026-07-16vs Carpenter/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Green / Eva Farris vs JoAnn Cooper / SHELLEY O'CONNOR6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamantha Towne / Gabriela Herbst vs Nicci Watson / Megan Toms3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Casey Gleysteen vs Kerstin Wright / Gwendolyn Mrva0-6, 4-6
2026-07-13vs Denney/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Green / Eva Farris vs Kyle Denney / Lauren Cunningham3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Swanquist / Libby Nabors vs Danielle Brewer / Maria Foley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Cristina Guibao vs Amy Smythe / Emily Rainey4-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Johnson/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Sappenfield / Paige Swanquist vs Jess Flanders / Olivia House4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer London / Constance Conley vs Faith Ruch / Sharon Shipley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllie Gibbs / Gabriela Herbst vs Kate Sullivan / Tanner Baker6-1, 6-3
2026-06-18vs Carpenter/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesConstance Conley / Emily Green vs JoAnn Cooper / SHELLEY O'CONNOR3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer London / Libby Nabors vs Dorothy Work / Nicci Watson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEllie Gibbs / Casey Gleysteen vs Samantha Rohlinger / Susan Gambrell6-2, 7-5
2026-06-15vs Harris/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJitana Bagomolny / Paige Swanquist vs Leigh Dill / Eleanore Maynard7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Sappenfield / Samantha Towne vs Elizabeth Darby / Laura Weaver6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrooke Davis / Casey Gleysteen vs Amber Sand / Rachel Spangler1-6, 0-6
2026-06-04vs Poulelis/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Green / Eva Farris vs Grace Bann / Autumn Rich3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Sappenfield / Jennifer London vs Shelby Kennedy / Pam Johnson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristina Guibao / Estelle Mitchell vs Madison Cleveland / Lauren Downs6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jitana Bagomolny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Eva Farris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Gabriela Harsanyi
published
2.88
Libby Nabors
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Constance Conley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Heather Sappenfield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Samantha Towne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Paige Swanquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Ellie Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Estelle Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Cristina Guibao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Casey Gleysteen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Brooke Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Sappenfield + Ellie Gibbs11266% games+25.5% vs expected
Cristina Guibao + Estelle Mitchell314 matchesnot enough data
Casey Gleysteen + Ellie Gibbs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jitana Bagomolny
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Eva Farris
22W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Gabriela Harsanyi
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Libby Nabors
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Constance Conley
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Heather Sappenfield
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
Samantha Towne
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Paige Swanquist
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Ellie Gibbs
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Estelle Mitchell
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Cristina Guibao
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Casey Gleysteen
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Brooke Davis
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Michael-John Garnett
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.