Teams

Western: Team M&M

2025 18&Over Women · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-15vs Team J&KWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons / Melissa Gelman vs Rose Sweeney / Linda Cavallaro6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesIvy Raines vs Barbara Benedict6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Catherine Faruolo vs Virginia Trobert / Leila Gungor1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-08vs Team J&KLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons / Melissa Zygmont vs Reeby Kirane / Josephine Anthony4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesIvy Raines / Laurie Panto vs Jen Modesti / Leila Gungor7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-01vs Team J&KWon 30
W#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Anne Farella vs Nicole Adsitt / Virginia Trobert6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEllen Furnari vs Josephine Anthony7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons / Carol Sluis vs Leila Gungor / Amy LaVaute6-1, 6-3
2025-05-18vs Team J&KWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Zygmont / Carol Sluis vs Jen Modesti / Rose Sweeney6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Gelman / Lori Miller vs Virginia Trobert / Amy LaVaute6-3, 6-1
2025-05-04vs Team J&KWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Zygmont / Catherine Faruolo vs Josephine Anthony / Virginia Trobert6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIvy Raines vs Ginny Robbins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Furnari / Laurie Panto vs Barbara Benedict / Amy LaVaute2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Team J&KSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Miller / Laurie Panto vs Amy LaVaute / Leila Gungor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Zygmont / Melissa Gelman vs Reeby Kirane / Nicole Adsitt4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-06vs Team J&KWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Farella / Melissa Gelman vs Ginny Robbins / Reeby Kirane6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesIvy Raines vs Barbara Benedict0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Miller / Laurie Panto vs Nicole Adsitt / Virginia Trobert6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-30vs Team J&KLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Furnari / Ivy Raines vs Jen Modesti / Barbara Benedict0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChantra Bonomo vs Josephine Anthony7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Panto / Anne Farella vs Amy LaVaute / Linda Cavallaro6-3, 6-1
2025-03-23vs Team J&KWon 30
W#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Anne Farella vs Linda Cavallaro / Reeby Kirane6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIvy Raines vs Nicole Adsitt7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Furnari / Carol Sluis vs Leila Gungor / Rose Sweeney6-2, 6-0
2025-03-16vs Team J&KLost 12
L#1 DoublesChantra Bonomo / Lori Miller vs Jen Modesti / Ginny Robbins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEllen Furnari vs Reeby Kirane6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Sluis / Laurie Panto vs Nicole Adsitt / Virginia Trobert5-7, 2-6
2025-03-09vs Team J&KWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Farella / Catherine Faruolo vs Linda Cavallaro / Amy LaVaute6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChantra Bonomo vs Jen Modesti6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Furnari / Carol Sluis vs Leila Gungor / Rose Sweeney6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Anne Farella
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.43
Chantra Bonomo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.43
Ellen Furnari
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.34
Melissa Gelman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Melissa Zygmont
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Ivy Raines
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.24
Lori Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.17
Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Carol Sluis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.91
Laurie Panto
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Farella + Chantra Bonomo6261% games+10.3% vs expected
Melissa Zygmont + Melissa Gelman1439% games−12.5% vs expected
Carol Sluis + Lori Miller2342% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Panto + Lori Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Farella + Lori Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Ivy Raines + Ellen Furnari123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Farella
28W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Chantra Bonomo
25W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
2.5
Ellen Furnari
17W–27L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Melissa Gelman
19W–42L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.34
Melissa Zygmont
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Ivy Raines
8W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Lori Miller
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
Lisa Troubetaris-Fitzgibbons
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Carol Sluis
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Laurie Panto
8W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.