Teams

Fish BBTC 18

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-GC · 3.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-19vs BBTC - WardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary-Katherine Barnes / Robert Barnes Lll vs Gage Switzer / Paulette Dawkins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRussell Weatherly / Gracie Weatherly vs Amber Juraszek / Nick McGuffee4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeAnn Davis / Keith Ward vs Dena Karr / Preston Taylor6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-05vs OSTC Adamo 18+ 7.0 MixedWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Fish / LeAnn Davis vs Glenn Fosnacht / Crystal Harper6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Barnes Lll / Mary-Katherine Barnes vs Ashley Wilson / Bruce Ly4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRussell Weatherly / Gracie Weatherly vs Angela Vo / Rick Liebig6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Michael Penny
published
3.37
Russell Weatherly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Robert Barnes Lll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Damien Colbet
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Keith Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mary-Katherine Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Kevin Fish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Gwen Urbati
published
3.14
DeAnn Fontenot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.12
Gracie Weatherly
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
LeAnn Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathryn Plott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwen Urbati + Michael Penny9162% games+17.7% vs expected
Kevin Fish + LeAnn Davis2440% gamesnot enough data
Robert Barnes Lll + Mary-Katherine Barnes4158% gamesnot enough data
DeAnn Fontenot + Damien Colbet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Penny
50W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Russell Weatherly
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Robert Barnes Lll
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Damien Colbet
31W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Keith Ward
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Mary-Katherine Barnes
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Kevin Fish
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gwen Urbati
54W–26L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3
DeAnn Fontenot
39W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Gracie Weatherly
30W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
LeAnn Davis
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Kathryn Plott
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.