Teams

OVP/Dean (MXD 4.0)

2026 COTA USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Summer · Mixed 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-20vs COTA/Coreen DeLamaterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNathan Myers / Ashley Rentz vs Coreen Delamater / Brad Garrison2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMatthew Howard / Rebecca Rea vs Amelia DeLamater / Albert Laing6-3, 6-0
2026-07-13vs ATC/Kimura (MXD 4.0)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Howard / Rebecca Rea vs Devin Hosea / Emily Campbell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDamon Krebs / Mo Creech vs Kristina Turner / Leonardo Noleto1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Stephen Daniel vs Mauhaun Taheri / Maureen Truett5-7, 6-7
2026-06-29vs OVP/Price/Peters (MXD 4.0)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMo Creech / Damon Krebs vs Sydney Felker / Daniel Hallow7-6, 1-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Sadler / Wes Ivester vs Eric Green / Kimberly McDuffie3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChristopher Strother / Vanessa SHONKWILER vs Victoria Vadeboncoeur / Evan Elder6-7, 0-6
2026-06-22vs COTA/Coreen DeLamaterLost 12
L#1 DoublesDamian Kapcala / Ashley Rentz vs Robert Newsome / Amelia DeLamater4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Rea / Matthew Howard vs Brad Garrison / Amanda Patterson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWes Ivester / Elizabeth Sadler vs Coreen Delamater / Samuel Hodges2-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs ATC/Kimura (MXD 4.0)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Howard / Rebecca Rea vs Maureen Truett / Mauhaun Taheri6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNathan Myers / Jaime Christian vs Mattox Shuler / Kristina Turner5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Stephen Daniel vs Emily Harrison / Steven Tabor3-6, 4-6
2026-06-01vs OVP/Price/Peters (MXD 4.0)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Stephen Daniel vs Sydney Felker / Daniel Hallow6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Howard / Rebecca Rea vs Lisa Bowen / Eric Green6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDamian Kapcala / Sara Shue vs Kelly Price / John McMullan5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Mixed 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COTA/Coreen DeLamater5113512137
2OVP/Dean (MXD 4.0)339920164
3ATC/Kimura (MXD 4.0)339921173
4OVP/Price/Peters (MXD 4.0)1551327194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Matthew Howard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Damian Kapcala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Rebecca Rea
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Jaime Christian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Mo Creech
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Ashley Rentz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Brooke Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Damon Krebs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Nathan Myers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Wes Ivester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Elizabeth Sadler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Christopher Strother
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Sharon Ross
published
3.15
Vanessa SHONKWILER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Sara Shue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Cheryl Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Harrison Feinstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Rea + Matthew Howard11069% games+14.4% vs expected
Mo Creech + Damon Krebs3452% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Howard
18W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Damian Kapcala
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Rea
58W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Jaime Christian
67W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Mo Creech
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Ashley Rentz
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brooke Daniel
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Damon Krebs
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Nathan Myers
33W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Wes Ivester
39W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Elizabeth Sadler
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.20
3.5
Christopher Strother
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Sharon Ross
4W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Vanessa SHONKWILER
24W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.15
Sara Shue
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Cheryl Dean
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Harrison Feinstein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.