Teams

TBlankenship (PCC)

2026 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-24vs TWard (FCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPenny Hill / Janet Reynolds vs Tammy Ward / Lorna O'Callaghan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Bullard / Sylvia Walker vs Nicole Shelley / Christy Lovette2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTrina Blankenship / Monica Smith vs Fran Kamp / Anne Paramore6-7, 0-6
2026-04-17vs KHammack/LMaloney (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPenny Hill / Sharon Dolan vs Allison Adzema / Alyce Lofgren3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Gilliam / Susan Claire vs Jane Hadley / Susan McGarry7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSylvia Walker / Elizabeth Rudder vs Linda Maloney / Anne Schmitt1-6, 3-6
2026-04-10vs CMarko (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Kreisher / Penny Hill vs AMY SAFIR / Barbara Northrup4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCassandra Greco / Sharon Dolan vs Sally Davidson / Karen Foster2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSylvia Walker / Susan Claire vs Catherine Rousseaux / Chris Marko0-6, 0-6
2026-04-03vs JGieker (Lifetime)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLacey Johnson Boatman / Monica Smith vs Lisa Pacello / Sonia Waters4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPenny Hill / Cassandra Greco vs Ofelia Claxton / Dana Ferguson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Dolan / Trina Blankenship vs Stacey Reinhardt / Karen Watford1-6, 0-6
2026-03-27vs GMurrell/TEvans (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Gilliam / Janet Reynolds vs Cindy Renk / Joan Slep6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTonja Padgett / Sylvia Walker vs Jennifer Smith / Linda Hindel5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTrina Blankenship / Jean Kreisher vs Dianne Petrosino / Laura Batten7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-20vs ACheek/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Dolan / Susan Claire vs Shelley Crocker / Mary Beth Servie7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCassandra Greco / Monica Smith vs Lisa Wright / Laura Difraia6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTrina Blankenship / Jean Kreisher vs Yvonne Ceran / Julie Strack1-6, 2-6
2026-03-13vs MDevendorf (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Claire / Cassandra Greco vs Leslie Masucci / Holly Pasut2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Dolan / Tonja Padgett vs Catherine Gilbride / Maria del Mar Vazquez3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Rudder / Lacey Johnson Boatman vs Mildred Deely / Rachel Drees6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs DSenay (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Gilliam / Janet Reynolds vs Margot Dorsel / Sherry Teat6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCassandra Greco / Jean Kreisher vs Iveth Major / Suzanne Wlezniak0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Dolan / Tonja Padgett vs Marla Horvath / Jennifer Shirley6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Janet Gilliam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Bullard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Sharon Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Elizabeth Rudder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Cassandra Greco
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.99
Tonja Padgett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Lacey Johnson Boatman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Susan Claire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Jean Kreisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Sylvia Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Trina Blankenship
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassandra Greco + Lacey Johnson Boatman2445% gamesnot enough data
Tonja Padgett + Lacey Johnson Boatman3244% gamesnot enough data
Joan Bullard + Cassandra Greco044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Rudder + Lacey Johnson Boatman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Gilliam
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Joan Bullard
30W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Janet Reynolds
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Sharon Dolan
1W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Rudder
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Cassandra Greco
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Tonja Padgett
42W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Lacey Johnson Boatman
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Susan Claire
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jean Kreisher
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Sylvia Walker
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.82
Trina Blankenship
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.